ArticleBMC pediatrics2025
Using machine learning models based on cardiac magnetic resonance parameters to predict the prognostic in children with myocarditis.
Article in BMC pediatrics, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- The role of artificial intelligence in pediatric cardiovascular imaging: clinical applications and future directions in computed tomography and magnetic resonance imaging.Pediatric radiology · 2026Review
- MyoClass: A modular multimodal auto-classification system for myocardial tissue characterization.The international journal of cardiovascular imaging · 2026Article
- Clinical significance and mechanistic study of SOX2-OT and miR-27b-3p expression in children with viral myocarditis.BMC pediatrics · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors.
Funding
Abstract
objectiveTo develop machine learning (ML) models incorporating explanatory cardiac magnetic resonance (CMR) parameters for predicting the prognosis of myocarditis in pediatric patients. MATERIALS AND
methods77 patients with pediatric myocarditis diagnosed clinically between January 2020 and December 2023 were enrolled retrospectively. All patients were examined by ultrasound, electrocardiogram (ECG), serum biomarkers on admission, and CMR scan to obtain 16 explanatory CMR parameters. All patients underwent follow-up echocardiography and CMR. Patients were divided into two groups according to the occurrence of adverse cardiac events (ACE) during follow-up: the poor prognosis group (n = 23) and the good prognosis group (n = 54). Four models were established, including logistic regression (LR), random forest (RF), support vector machine classifier (SVC), and extreme gradient boosting (XGBoost) model. The performance of each model was evaluated by the area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC). Model interpretation was generated by Shapley additive interpretation (Shap).
resultsAmong the four models, the three most important features were late gadolinium enhancement (LGE), left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF), and SAXPeak Global Circumferential Strain (SAXGCS). In addition, LGE, LVEF, SAXGCS, and LAXPeak Global Longitudinal Strain (LAXGLS) were selected as the key predictors for all four models. Four interpretable CMR parameters were extracted, among which the LR model had the best prediction performance. The AUC, sensitivity, and specificity were 0.893, 0.820, and 0.944, respectively. The findings indicate that the presence of LGE on CMR imaging, along with reductions in LVEF, SAXGCS, and LAXGLS, are predictive of poor prognosis in patients with acute myocarditis.
conclusionML models, particularly the LR model, demonstrate the potential to predict the prognosis of children with myocarditis. These findings provide valuable insights for cardiologists, supporting more informed clinical decision-making and potentially enhancing patient outcomes in pediatric myocarditis cases.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.