Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40410950›Full record

ArticleAging cell2025

Combined Effects of Mechanical Loading and Piezo1 Chemical Activation on 22-Months-Old Female Mouse Bone Adaptation.

Quentin A Meslier, Robert Oehrlein, Sandra J Shefelbine

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Aging cell, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Yoda molecules agonize PIEZO2.bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2026
    Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Quentin A MeslierDepartment of Bioengineering, Northeastern University, Boston, Massachusetts, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-2283-2241
Robert OehrleinDepartment of Bioengineering, Northeastern University, Boston, Massachusetts, USA.
Sandra J ShefelbineDepartment of Bioengineering, Northeastern University, Boston, Massachusetts, USA.

Funding

National Science Foundation CMMI # 2010010
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

With age, bones mechanosensitivity is reduced, which limits their ability to adapt to loading. The exact mechanism leading to this loss of mechanosensitvity is still unclear, making developing effective treatment challenging. Current treatments mostly focus on preventing bone mass loss (such as bisphosphonates) or promoting bone formation (such as Sclerostin inhibitors) to limit the decline of bones mass. However, treatments do not target the cause of bone mass loss which may be, in part, due to the bone's inability to initiate a normal bone mechanoadaptation response. In this work, we investigated the effects of 2 weeks of tibia loading, and Piezo1 agonist injection in vivo on 22-month-old mouse bone adaptation response. We used an optimized loading profile, which induced high fluid flow velocity and low strain magnitude in adult mouse tibia. We found that tibia loading and Yoda2 injection have an additive effect on increasing cortical bone parameters in 22-month-old mice. In vivo osteocytes calcium signaling imaging suggests that Yoda2 is able to reach osteocytes and activate Piezo1. This combination of mechanical and chemical stimulation could be a promising treatment strategy to help promote bone formation in patients who have low bone mass due to aging.

Indexed as

Adaptation, PhysiologicalBone and BonesIon ChannelsTibiaAnimalsFemaleMiceMice, Inbred C57BLOsteocytesStress, MechanicalWeight-BearingIon ChannelsPiezo1 protein, mouseagingbonein vivo calcium signalingmechanoadaptationosteocytesPiezo1tibia loading

Identifiers

PMID40410950
PMCPMC12341773

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.