Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40411642›Full record

ArticleSupportive care in cancer : official journal of the Multinational Association of Supportive Care in Cancer2025

Barriers and facilitators for participation in brain magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) scans in cancer research: a feasibility and acceptability analysis.

Thushini Manuweera, Keerthana Karunakaran, Camille Baechler, Javier Rosales, Amber S Kleckner, Paula Rosenblatt, Aaron Ciner, Ian R Kleckner

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Supportive care in cancer : official journal of the Multinational Association of Supportive Care in Cancer, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Pilot trial testing the effects of exercise on chemotherapy-induced peripheral neurotoxicity (CIPN) and the interoceptive brain system.Supportive care in cancer : official journal of the Multinational Association of Supportive Care in Cancer · 2024
    Trial
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Thushini ManuweeraUniversity of Maryland School of Nursing, Baltimore, MD, USA.
Keerthana KarunakaranMassachusetts General Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA.
Camille BaechlerUniversity of Maryland School of Nursing, Baltimore, MD, USA.
Javier RosalesUniversity of Maryland School of Nursing, Baltimore, MD, USA.
Amber S KlecknerUniversity of Maryland School of Nursing, Baltimore, MD, USA.
Paula RosenblattUniversity of Maryland School of Nursing, Baltimore, MD, USA.
Aaron CinerUniversity of Maryland School of Nursing, Baltimore, MD, USA.
Ian R KlecknerUniversity of Maryland School of Nursing, Baltimore, MD, USA. ian.kleckner@umaryland.edu.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-9828-9986

Funding

The Effects of Exercise on Chemotherapy-Induced Peripheral Neuropathy, Inflammation, and Interoceptive Brain CircuitryK07CA221931 · NCI · UNIVERSITY OF ROCHESTER · PI KLECKNER, IAN ROBERT · 2018 to 2022
$795k
Effects of exercise during platinum chemotherapy on neuropathy: examining the interoceptive brain system and inflammationR21CA259422 · NCI · UNIVERSITY OF MARYLAND BALTIMORE · PI KLECKNER, IAN ROBERT · 2022 to 2023
$394k
NIH HHS K07CA221931NIH HHS R21CA259422State of Maryland CH-649-CRF
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeA growing body of research suggests that the brain is implicated in cognitive impairment, fatigue, neuropathy, pain, nausea, sleep disturbances, distress, and other prevalent and burdensome symptoms of cancer and its treatments. Despite anecdotal evidence of difficulties using gold-standard magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) to study the brain, no studies have systematically reported reasons that patients with cancer do or do not complete research MRI scans, making it difficult to understand the role of the brain related to these symptoms. The goal of this study was to investigate these reasons and to suggest possible solutions.

methodsWe analyzed data from 120 patients with cancer (mostly breast and gastrointestinal) from three studies: MRI was mandatory in Study 1; MRI was optional in Studies 2-3. Patients provided reasons for completing or not completing optional research MRI scans.

resultsThe percentage of scans completed when MRI was mandatory was 76%, and when optional, it was 35%. The most common reasons for not completing optional scans were claustrophobia (28%), scheduling conflicts (22%), safety contraindications (15%), the scanner being too far away (9%), and discomfort (8%). Older participants were slightly more likely to decline at least one optional scan (log(odds) = 0.06/year, p = 0.02).

conclusionAlthough brain MRI is feasible for many patients with cancer, it can be difficult or not feasible for patients with claustrophobia, safety issues, busy schedules, or transportation issues. Improving communication, comfort, and access to a scanner may help. Reducing inequities related to study participation can improve research supportive care research.

Indexed as

BrainMagnetic Resonance ImagingNeoplasmsAdultAgedAged, 80 and overAge FactorsFeasibility StudiesFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedAcceptabilityBarriersBrainEquityFacilitatorsMRI

Identifiers

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.