ArticleBMJ open2025
Support measures and demand among healthcare workers during the COVID-19 pandemic: a survey in high-workload provinces of China, 2023.
Article in BMJ open, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Article
- Attitudes Toward Common Data Models Among Chinese Biomedical Professionals: Cross-Sectional Survey.JMIR medical informatics · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
objectivesTo assess the demands for support measures of healthcare workers (HCWs) in China's high-workload provinces during the COVID-19 pandemic and identify specific needs to make evidence-based recommendations.
designProspective cross-sectional study.
settingConducted in three Chinese provinces characterised by their significant healthcare demands during the pandemic.
participantsThe study comprised 683 HCWs, including doctors, nurses, resident physicians and hospital administrators. The sample was predominantly female (68.1%), with the majority aged between 25 and 34 years. Participants were recruited through convenience and snowball sampling methods, with a focus on individuals working in high-intensity clinical environments.
resultsHierarchical analysis was performed to assess the layered impact of support measures across different roles and genders. Substantial gender disparity was observed, with female staff reporting significantly reduced access to material support (p<0.001), family counselling (p<0.001) and health management (p<0.05), alongside a generally higher demand for various support types. In contrast, HCWs assigned to COVID-19 units did not exhibit heightened needs for COVID-specific training (p<0.001), material support (p<0.001), stress management (p<0.001), family counselling (p<0.001) or rational shift patterns (p<0.001) compared with those in non-COVID-19-focused roles.
conclusionThe study identifies significant support deficiencies, particularly among female HCWs, and emphasises the necessity for targeted interventions to strengthen healthcare system resilience. Recommendations include prioritising adequate rest, equitable resource allocation and the implementation of gender-oriented policies to ensure workforce sustainability and maintain care quality. Further research should focus on longitudinal support dynamics.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.