ArticleBMJ open2025
Efficacy and safety of
Article in BMJ open, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT06494683 (Efficacy and Safety of Pueraria Lobata Radix As an Adjuvant Treatment for Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus), which is not on this map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Efficacy and Safety of Pueraria Lobata Radix As an Adjuvant Treatment for Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus: a Multicenter, Randomized, Double-blinded, Placebo-controlled Trial
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
13 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
introductionThe current pharmacological management of type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM) faces challenges such as low rates of optimal glycaemic control, high incidences of adverse drug reactions and suboptimal treatment compliance. METHODS AND ANALYSIS: This study is a multicentre, randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial. 200 patients with T2DM will be randomly allocated to either the PLR group or the placebo group for a consecutive 12-week intervention. Regular visits will be conducted at weeks 4, 8 and 12, following the initiation of the study to evaluate the efficacy and safety of PLR. The primary outcome is the change in haemoglobin A1c (HbA1c) from baseline at week 12. Secondary outcomes include changes in HbA1c from baseline at weeks 4 and 8; the HbA1c response rate (< 7%), changes in fasting blood glucose, 2-hour blood glucose, fasting C-peptide, body mass index, severity of diabetes symptoms, quality of life from baseline at weeks 4, 8 and 12; and changes in blood lipid indicators at week 12. Safety outcomes include the incidences of total adverse events (AEs), serious AEs and PLR-related AEs. ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION: The protocol has been approved by the Ethics Committees of the First Affiliated Hospital of Nanchang University (approval number: IIT[2024]LLS No.303) and the Affiliated Hospital of Jiangxi University of Chinese Medicine (approval number: JZFYLL2024006200087). We will disseminate the study findings through publications in peer-reviewed journals and conference presentations. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: ClinicalTrials.gov NCT06494683.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.