Evidence mapPaperPMID 40413201Full record

ArticleScientific reports2025

Exploring voice as a digital phenotype in adults with ADHD.

Georg G von Polier, Eike Ahlers, Julia Volkening, Jörg Langner, Kaustubh R Patil, Simon B Eickhoff, Florian Helmhold, Agnieszka Ewa Krautz, Daina Langner

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Georg G von Polier *Institute of Neuroscience and Medicine Brain and Behaviour, Forschungszentrum Jülich, Wilhelm-Johnen-Str, 52528, Jülich, Germany. g.von.polier@fz-juelich.de.
Eike Ahlers *Institute of Psychiatry Campus Benjamin Franklin, Charité - Universitätsmedizin Berlin, corporate member of Freie Universität Berlin, Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin, Berlin Institute of Health, Berlin, Germany.
Julia VolkeningInstitute of Neuroscience and Medicine Brain and Behaviour, Forschungszentrum Jülich, Wilhelm-Johnen-Str, 52528, Jülich, Germany.
Jörg LangnerPeakProfiling GmbH, Berlin, Germany.
Kaustubh R PatilInstitute of Neuroscience and Medicine Brain and Behaviour, Forschungszentrum Jülich, Wilhelm-Johnen-Str, 52528, Jülich, Germany.
Simon B EickhoffInstitute of Neuroscience and Medicine Brain and Behaviour, Forschungszentrum Jülich, Wilhelm-Johnen-Str, 52528, Jülich, Germany.
Florian HelmholdPeakProfiling GmbH, Berlin, Germany.
Agnieszka Ewa KrautzPeakProfiling GmbH, Berlin, Germany.
Daina LangnerInstitute of Psychiatry Campus Benjamin Franklin, Charité - Universitätsmedizin Berlin, corporate member of Freie Universität Berlin, Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin, Berlin Institute of Health, Berlin, Germany.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Current diagnostic procedures for attention deficit hyperactivity disorder (ADHD) are mainly subjective and prone to bias. While research on potential biomarkers, including EEG, brain imaging, and genetics is promising, it has yet to demonstrate clinical utility. Dopaminergic signaling alternations and executive functioning, crucial to ADHD pathology, are closely related to voice production. Consistently, previous studies point to alterations in voice and speech production in ADHD. However, studies investigating voice in large clinical samples allowing for individual-level prediction of ADHD are lacking. Here, 387 ADHD patients, 204 healthy controls, and 100 psychiatric controls underwent standardized diagnostic assessment. Subjects provided multiple 3-minutes speech samples, yielding 920 samples. Based on prosodic voice features, random forest-based classifications were performed, and cross-validated out-of-sample accuracy was calculated. The classification of ADHD showed the best performance in young female participants (AUC = 0.87) with lower performance in older participants and males. Psychiatric comorbidity did not alter the classification performance. Voice features were associated with ADHD-symptom severity as indicated by random forest regressions. In summary, prosodic features seem to be promising candidates for further research into voice-based digital phenotypes of ADHD.

Indexed as

Attention Deficit Disorder with HyperactivityVoiceAdultCase-Control StudiesFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedPhenotypeSpeechYoung AdultADHDAI diagnosticsDigital biomarkerMachine learningPrecision psychiatryVoice as a biomarker

Identifiers

PMID40413201
PMCPMC12103603

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.