ArticleScientific reports2025
Exploring voice as a digital phenotype in adults with ADHD.
Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- Speech and Language Markers as Longitudinal Predictors of Youth Mental Health: A Systematic Review.Early intervention in psychiatry · 2025Pooled it
- Voices of change: associations between vocal markers and symptoms of ADHD - Findings from the LIFE child study.European child & adolescent psychiatry · 2026Article
- Digital health technologies for adults with ADHD: a scoping review.Frontiers in digital health · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Current diagnostic procedures for attention deficit hyperactivity disorder (ADHD) are mainly subjective and prone to bias. While research on potential biomarkers, including EEG, brain imaging, and genetics is promising, it has yet to demonstrate clinical utility. Dopaminergic signaling alternations and executive functioning, crucial to ADHD pathology, are closely related to voice production. Consistently, previous studies point to alterations in voice and speech production in ADHD. However, studies investigating voice in large clinical samples allowing for individual-level prediction of ADHD are lacking. Here, 387 ADHD patients, 204 healthy controls, and 100 psychiatric controls underwent standardized diagnostic assessment. Subjects provided multiple 3-minutes speech samples, yielding 920 samples. Based on prosodic voice features, random forest-based classifications were performed, and cross-validated out-of-sample accuracy was calculated. The classification of ADHD showed the best performance in young female participants (AUC = 0.87) with lower performance in older participants and males. Psychiatric comorbidity did not alter the classification performance. Voice features were associated with ADHD-symptom severity as indicated by random forest regressions. In summary, prosodic features seem to be promising candidates for further research into voice-based digital phenotypes of ADHD.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.