Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40413333›Full record

SynthesisAnnals of surgical oncology2025

National Guidelines for Cytoreductive Surgery and Hyperthermic Intraperitoneal Chemotherapy (HIPEC) in Peritoneal Malignancies: A Worldwide Systematic Review and Recommendations of Strength Analysis.

Marco Tonello, Carola Cenzi, Elisa Pizzolato, Manuela Martini, Pierluigi Pilati, Antonio Sommariva

Abstract readSystematic Review
In one paragraph

Synthesis in Annals of surgical oncology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 14 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
14citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

14 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Review
  3. Catheter based intraperitoneal chemotherapy using taxane for peritoneal metastases from gastric cancer: from bench to bedside-a narrative review.Gastric cancer : official journal of the International Gastric Cancer Association and the Japanese Gastric Cancer Association · 2026
    Review
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Review
  14. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Marco TonelloUnit of Surgical Oncology of the Digestive Tract, Surgical Oncology Department, Veneto Institute of Oncology IOV-IRCCS, Padua, Castelfranco Veneto, TV, Italy. marco.tonello@iov.veneto.it.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-7190-2106
Carola CenziClinical Research Unit, Veneto Institute of Oncology IOV-IRCCS, Padua, Italy.
Elisa PizzolatoUnit of Surgical Oncology of the Digestive Tract, Surgical Oncology Department, Veneto Institute of Oncology IOV-IRCCS, Padua, Castelfranco Veneto, TV, Italy.
Manuela MartiniUnit of Surgical Oncology of the Digestive Tract, Surgical Oncology Department, Veneto Institute of Oncology IOV-IRCCS, Padua, Castelfranco Veneto, TV, Italy.
Pierluigi PilatiUnit of Surgical Oncology of the Digestive Tract, Surgical Oncology Department, Veneto Institute of Oncology IOV-IRCCS, Padua, Castelfranco Veneto, TV, Italy.
Antonio SommarivaUnit of Surgical Oncology of the Digestive Tract, Surgical Oncology Department, Veneto Institute of Oncology IOV-IRCCS, Padua, Castelfranco Veneto, TV, Italy.

Funding

Ministero della Salute Ricerca Corrente
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundNational guidelines (GLs) for surgical cytoreduction (CRS) and hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy (HIPEC) in the management of peritoneal malignancies (PMs) vary across countries, scientific societies, and government agencies. This study aimed to systematically review and compare the recommendations for CRS/HIPEC in the treatment of ovarian cancer (EOC), gastric cancer, colorectal cancer (CRC), mesothelioma, and pseudomyxoma peritonei (PMP).

methodsMedical databases, search engines, and national websites of 193 countries were queried using artificial intelligence (AI)-powered software for scientific societies and/or government agencies guidelines. The study excluded consensus statements and guidelines without appropriate references. Non-English guidelines were translated, and data, including GRADE strength of recommendations, were extracted.

resultsThe study analyzed 138 guidelines, 24 for gastric cancer, 36 for colorectal cancer, 29 for primary ovarian cancer (p-)EOC, 28 for recurrent ovarian cancer (r-)EOC, 10 for mesothelioma, and 11 for PMP. Guidelines were retrieved from 51 (26.4%) nations, mostly from developed countries (62.1%; p < 0.001). The CRS procedure received robust positive recommendations (GRADE I/IIa) for CRC (74.2%), p-/r-EOC (100%/78.5%), PMP (90.9%), and mesothelioma (90.0%). Conversely, CRS was not indicated for gastric cancer (61.6%, GRADE III; p < 0.001). The HIPEC procedure had robust positive recommendations for PMP (90.9%) and mesothelioma (90.0%), but was controversial for p-EOC (42.3%) and CRC (38.0%) and contraindicated for r-EOC (80.0%) and gastric cancer (62.4%) (p < 0.001).

conclusionNational guidelines concordantly recommend CRS for colorectal cancer, ovarian cancer, PMP, and mesothelioma. In contrast, HIPEC recommendations are less homogeneously shared, except for PMP and mesothelioma. No positive concordance exists among guidelines on gastric cancer for CRS nor HIPEC. Furthermore, high-level evidence is needed to strengthen future guidelines on peritoneal metastases.

Indexed as

Cytoreduction Surgical ProceduresHyperthermic Intraperitoneal ChemotherapyPeritoneal NeoplasmsPractice Guidelines as TopicColorectal NeoplasmsCombined Modality TherapyFemaleHumansOvarian NeoplasmsStomach NeoplasmsCytoreductive surgery (CRS)HIPECNational guidelinesPeritoneal malignancies

Identifiers

PMID40413333
PMCPMC12222385

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.