Evidence mapPaperPMID 40413339Full record

ArticleScientific reports2025

Integration of network pharmacology, transcriptomics, and experimental verification to investigate the mechanism of action of cepharanthine hydrochloride against prostate cancer.

Zongming Dong, Xiaosa Chang, Xing Luo, Hui Li, Ming Deng, Zeyu Huang, Tingting Chen, Yu Chen, Bishao Sun, Yingbing Wu and 4 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

14 authors.

Zongming Dong *Department of Urology, Urologic Surgery Center, Xinqiao Hospital, Third Military Medical University (Army Medical University), Chongqing, 400037, China.
Xiaosa Chang *Department of Urology, Urologic Surgery Center, Xinqiao Hospital, Third Military Medical University (Army Medical University), Chongqing, 400037, China.
Xing Luo *Department of Urology, Urologic Surgery Center, Xinqiao Hospital, Third Military Medical University (Army Medical University), Chongqing, 400037, China.
Hui LiDepartment of Ultrasound, Xinqiao Hospital, Army Medical University, Chongqing, 400037, China.
Ming DengDepartment of Urology, Urologic Surgery Center, Xinqiao Hospital, Third Military Medical University (Army Medical University), Chongqing, 400037, China.
Zeyu HuangDepartment of Urology, Urologic Surgery Center, Xinqiao Hospital, Third Military Medical University (Army Medical University), Chongqing, 400037, China.
Tingting ChenDepartment of Urology, Urologic Surgery Center, Xinqiao Hospital, Third Military Medical University (Army Medical University), Chongqing, 400037, China.
Yu ChenDepartment of Urology, Urologic Surgery Center, Xinqiao Hospital, Third Military Medical University (Army Medical University), Chongqing, 400037, China.
Bishao SunDepartment of Urology, Urologic Surgery Center, Xinqiao Hospital, Third Military Medical University (Army Medical University), Chongqing, 400037, China.
Yingbing WuDepartment of Urology, Urologic Surgery Center, Xinqiao Hospital, Third Military Medical University (Army Medical University), Chongqing, 400037, China.
Ronghua WuDepartment of Urology, Urologic Surgery Center, Xinqiao Hospital, Third Military Medical University (Army Medical University), Chongqing, 400037, China.
Qingjian WuDepartment of Urology, Urologic Surgery Center, Xinqiao Hospital, Third Military Medical University (Army Medical University), Chongqing, 400037, China.
Jingzhen ZhuDepartment of Urology, Urologic Surgery Center, Xinqiao Hospital, Third Military Medical University (Army Medical University), Chongqing, 400037, China. zhujz1114@tmmu.edu.cn.
Ji ZhengDepartment of Urology, Urologic Surgery Center, Xinqiao Hospital, Third Military Medical University (Army Medical University), Chongqing, 400037, China. jizheng@tmmu.edu.cn.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The incidence of prostate cancer (PCa) is high among elderly men. Cepharanthine hydrochloride (CH) is recognized for its important role in the prevention and treatment of various diseases. However, its effects and mechanisms of action in the context of PCa remain unclear. Our study aims to examine the therapeutic role and mechanisms of action of CH in PCa. Targets of CH and PCa-related genes were identified using different databases, and the biological processes through which CH might exert its therapeutic effects were predicted via protein-protein interaction (PPI) network and enrichment analyses. Subsequently, the PCa cell lines PC-3 and DU145 were used to assess the concentration- and time-dependent effects of CH on cell viability, proliferation, and migration. Transcriptomic sequencing and differential expression analysis were used to identify the key target protein of CH and the key signaling pathways involved in its therapeutic effects against PCa. Molecular docking was used to analyze the binding between CH and its target protein. Additionally, quantitative reverse transcription polymerase chain reaction (qRT-PCR), western blotting, gene knockout, pharmacological intervention, and tumor formation experiments were performed to validate the therapeutic effects and mechanisms of action of CH against PCa in vitro and in vivo. Network pharmacology showed that CH, a Chinese herbal medication, might prevent PCa by regulating protein phosphorylation-related biological processes. In vitro experiments showed that CH inhibited the proliferation and migration of PCa cells in a concentration-dependent manner. In addition, integration of transcriptomic sequencing, differential expression analysis, and GO enrichment analysis suggested that the ERK protein played a crucial role in the anti-tumor activity of CH. Molecular docking and molecular dynamics simulations revealed strong binding affinities between CH and ERK1/2. Further experimental verification, involving qRT-PCR, western blotting, gene knockout, pharmacological intervention, and tumor formation experiments, demonstrated that CH upregulated dual-specificity phosphatase (DUSP) 1 and suppressed the phosphorylation of ERK, thereby inhibiting the development and progression of PCa in vivo and in vitro. In conclusion, the findings of this study suggest that CH suppresses the ERK signaling pathway by enhancing the expression of DUSP1, thereby exerting anti-tumor effects against PCa in vitro and in vivo. Therefore, CH may serve as a novel therapeutic agent for PCa, showing remarkable potential for clinical application.

Indexed as

BenzylisoquinolinesProstatic NeoplasmsTranscriptomeAnimalsBenzodioxolesCell Line, TumorCell MovementCell ProliferationCell SurvivalGene Expression ProfilingGene Expression Regulation, NeoplasticHumansMaleMiceMolecular Docking SimulationNetwork PharmacologyBenzodioxolesBenzylisoquinolinescepharanthineCepharanthine hydrochlorideMechanism investigationsMolecular dockingNetwork pharmacologyProstate cancerTranscriptomics

Identifiers

PMID40413339
PMCPMC12103559

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.