Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40413733›Full record

ArticleAnnals of clinical and translational neurology2025

EEG Response to Sedation Interruption Complements Behavioral Assessment After Severe Brain Injury.

Charlotte Maschke, Loretta Norton, Catherine Duclos, Miriam Han, Kira Dolhan, Geoffrey Laforge, Allison Frantz, Xiaoyu Wang, Hassan Al-Hayawi, Tianyu Zhang and 3 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Annals of clinical and translational neurology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

13 authors.

Charlotte MaschkeMontreal General Hospital, McGill University Health Centre, Montreal, Canada.
Loretta NortonWestern Institute of Neuroscience, Western University, London, Ontario, Canada.ORCID 0000-0002-6651-1837
Catherine DuclosCentre for Advanced Research in Sleep Medicine and Integrated Trauma Centre, Centre Intégré Universitaire de Santé et de Services Sociaux du Nord-de-l'île-de-Montréal, Montréal, Quebec, Canada.
Miriam HanMontreal General Hospital, McGill University Health Centre, Montreal, Canada.
Kira DolhanMontreal General Hospital, McGill University Health Centre, Montreal, Canada.
Geoffrey LaforgeWestern Institute of Neuroscience, Western University, London, Ontario, Canada.
Allison FrantzMontreal General Hospital, McGill University Health Centre, Montreal, Canada.
Xiaoyu WangWestern Institute of Neuroscience, Western University, London, Ontario, Canada.
Hassan Al-HayawiWestern Institute of Neuroscience, Western University, London, Ontario, Canada.
Tianyu ZhangNeurology Department, McGill University Health Center, Montreal, Canada.
Raphaël LavoieMontreal General Hospital, McGill University Health Centre, Montreal, Canada.
Adrian M OwenWestern Institute of Neuroscience, Western University, London, Ontario, Canada.
Stefanie Blain-MoraesMontreal General Hospital, McGill University Health Centre, Montreal, Canada.ORCID 0000-0001-7837-6700

Funding

Canada First Research Excellence Fund (CFREF).CIHR 408004Fonds de recherche du Québec-Santé (FRQS)FRQNT Strategic Clusters Program 2020-RS4-265502Healthy Brains for Healthy LivesInstitute of Neurosciences, Mental Health and Addiction 480995Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada RGPIN-2023-03619
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveAccurate assessment of the level of consciousness and potential to recover in patients with severe brain injury underpins crucial decisions in the intensive care unit but remains a major challenge for the clinical team. The neurological wake-up test is a widely used assessment tool. However, many patients' behavioral responses during a short interruption of sedation are ambiguous or absent, yielding little prognostic value. This study assesses the brain's electroencephalogram response during an interruption of propofol sedation to complement behavioral assessment during the neurological wake-up test to predict survival, recovery of consciousness, and long-term functional outcomes in patients with acute severe brain injury.

methodsWe recorded 128-channel EEG from 41 severely brain-injured patients during a clinically indicated neurological wake-up test. Behavioral assessment was performed before and after interruption of propofol sedation, using the Glasgow Coma Scale. Brain response to sedation interruption was quantified using EEG power, spatial ratios, and the spectral exponent.

resultsRecovery of responsiveness during the neurological wake-up test is reflected in participants' brain response to sedation interruption. Electrophysiological patterns can be decoupled from participant behavioral response, with some individuals demonstrating neurophysiological signs of waking up despite an absent behavioral response. Using the brain response to complement behavioral assessment improved prognostic value, distinguished patients according to survival and outperformed outcome predictions of the patients' attending physician.

interpretationEEG can complement behavioral assessment during the neurological wake-up test to improve prognostication, inform clinicians, family members, and caregivers, and to set realistic goals for treatment and therapy.

Indexed as

Brain InjuriesElectroencephalographyHypnotics and SedativesPropofolAdultAgedFemaleGlasgow Coma ScaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedPrognosisYoung AdultHypnotics and SedativesPropofolanesthesiacomaconsciousnessEEGprognosis

Identifiers

PMID40413733
PMCPMC12257139

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.