Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40414206›Full record

ReviewKidney & blood pressure research2025

Rethinking Models of Chronic Kidney Disease Care: A Narrative Review.

Hannah Wallace, J Oliver Daly, Min Jun, Craig Nelson

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Kidney & blood pressure research, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Hannah WallaceFaculty of Medicine, Dentistry and Health Sciences, University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia.
J Oliver DalyCentre for Digital Transformation of Health, University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia.
Min JunThe George Institute for Global Health, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia.
Craig NelsonFaculty of Medicine, Dentistry and Health Sciences, University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundChronic kidney disease (CKD) affects over 850 million people worldwide and is associated with significant morbidity and mortality. There has been recent expansion in treatment options to reduce CKD progression and cardiovascular risk, and it is essential that this translates into clinical practice. SUMMARY: The primary objectives of this review were to outline current CKD care models and associated care gaps and review the literature for alternative care models, with a focus on the early detection and management of CKD. Several care models have been proposed to improve CKD management including nurse-led, pharmacy-led, integrated care models and digital interventions, with mixed results. KEY MESSAGES: There is a need for ongoing health systems and implementation research to improve translation of evidence into practice in the management of CKD.

Indexed as

Renal Insufficiency, ChronicHumansChronic kidney diseaseHealth systemsImplementationModels of care

Identifiers

PMID40414206
PMCPMC12201929

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.