ArticleBMC cancer2025
Efficacy and safety of combining tislelizumab with capecitabine compared to capecitabine alone in the adjuvant treatment of biliary tract cancers: rationale and protocol design for a randomized clinical trial.
Article in BMC cancer, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundAdjuvant therapy with capecitabine is recommended to improve survival for resectable biliary tract cancers (BTC) patients. Considering that the combination of PD-1/PD-L1 inhibitors with chemotherapy has demonstrated a survival benefit over chemotherapy alone in advanced stage BTC, we aim to evaluate the treatment efficacy and safety of tislelizumab, a PD-1 inhibitor, combined with capecitabine vs. capecitabine alone as an adjuvant treatment in patients with resectable BTC.
methodThis multicenter randomized controlled study will include a total of 140 patients who will have undergone curative resection within 4 weeks prior to enrollment and will have been pathologically diagnosed with cholangiocarcinoma (including intrahepatic and extrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma) or muscle-invasive gallbladder carcinoma. Those patients will be randomly assigned 1:1 to tislelizumab combined with capecitabine or capecitabine alone group. The primary endpoint will be recurrence free survival (RFS), the secondary endpoints will be overall survival (OS) and adverse events (AEs). Multi-omics biomarkers will be assessed as exploratory objective. DISCUSSION: There remains a major unmet need for more effective adjuvant therapies for resectable BTC. If this study demonstrates that adding tislelizumab enhances the therapeutic efficacy of capecitabine, this combined regimen will potentially improve the prognosis of patients with resectable BTC. In addition, we will analyze the relationship between various gene expression profiles and clinical endpoint events to define the ideal patient population receiving adjuvant immunotherapy.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.