ArticleScientific reports2025
A predictive model for hospital death in cancer patients with acute pulmonary embolism using XGBoost machine learning and SHAP interpretation.
Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
8 citing papers in PubMed.
- The result prediction of fluorescence in situ hybridization for breast cancer patients based on machine learning and deep learning models: a multicenter study.Cancer imaging : the official publication of the International Cancer Imaging Society · 2026Article
- Emergency Department Prediction of In-Hospital Mortality in Suspected Pulmonary Embolism: An Explainable Machine Learning Approach.Journal of clinical medicine · 2026Article
- Predicting anti-CCP positivity and early rheumatoid arthritis onset from routine laboratory parameters: a SHAP-explained machine learning pipeline.Frontiers in medicine · 2026Article
- An explainable machine learning framework for cardiovascular risk prediction using structured health data.Frontiers in artificial intelligence · 2026Article
- Exploration and analysis of risk factors for coronary artery disease with type 2 diabetes based on SHAP explainable machine learning algorithm.Scientific reports · 2025Article
- Article
- Association between the platelet-to-albumin ratio and 28-day all-cause mortality in critically ill patients with Pulmonary embolism: a retrospective cohort study and predictive model establishment based on machine learning.Frontiers in medicine · 2025Article
- PRESCO: an online tool for predicting severe pulmonary complications and survival after cancer surgery.Frontiers in oncology · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The prediction of in-hospital mortality in cancer patients with acute pulmonary embolism (APE) remains a significant clinical challenge. This study aimed to develop and validate a machine learning model using XGBoost to predict in-hospital mortality in this vulnerable population. A retrospective cohort study was conducted using the MIMIC-IV 2.2 database and external data from the intensive care unit of Cancer hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences, collected between May 1, 2021, and April 30, 2023. A total of 448 cancer patients with APE were included from the MIMIC-IV 2.2 database, divided into a training set (70%, n = 314) and an internal validation set (30%, n = 134). An external validation cohort consisted of 56 patients. An XGBoost model was trained and the SHAP (SHapley Additive Explanations) method was used to identify the top 10 predictors of in-hospital mortality. These predictors included Glasgow Coma Scale (GCS) score, albumin, platelet count, age, serum creatinine, hemoglobin, presence of metastasis, lactate, creatine kinase (CK), and types of cancer. The XGBoost model achieved an area under the ROC curve (AUC) of 0.806 (95% CI: 0.717-0.896) in the internal validation set and 0.724 (95% CI: 0.686-0.901) in the external validation set. Calibration curves indicated good model fit, and decision curve analysis (DCA) demonstrated a high clinical benefit across both the internal and external validation cohorts. The XGBoost model, leveraging SHAP for interpretation, effectively predicts in-hospital mortality in cancer patients with APE. This model provides valuable insights for clinical decision-making and has the potential to improve patient outcomes through early intervention and personalized treatment strategies. Further validation in diverse clinical settings is warranted to confirm its generalizability.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.