ArticleScandinavian journal of primary health care2025
Adapting the one minute preceptor model to a Swedish context - clinical tutors' experiences of its usage in primary health care.
Article in Scandinavian journal of primary health care, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundThe One Minute Preceptor model is one of few models proven to be effective in clinical training and validated for teaching clinical reasoning and medical knowledge. It has been introduced to tutors from various health care professions and is considered easy to learn. It is, however, not well-known in Scandinavian primary health care, and studies introducing the model in this context are lacking. Moreover, qualitative studies exploring the views of tutors using the model are also lacking. The aim was therefore to adapt the One Minute Preceptor model to a Swedish context and to explore tutors' experiences of applying it in a primary care setting. A qualitative method with quantitative elements was used.
methodsA workshop was designed and held in interprofessional groups at various primary health care centres in Region Stockholm. Follow-up interviews were conducted. Data were analysed using qualitative content analysis. Furthermore, pre- and post-surveys were administered.
resultsThe results showed that the tutors believed the model to be flexible, and easy to use and adapt, and their self-rated competence increased. Moreover, they believed it could help them give feedback and explore the students' reasoning. This is in line with previous research, but our study contributes by adding the tutor's
conclusionsIn conclusion, interprofessional workshops teaching the One Minute Preceptor model are readily held and may be feasible to scale up. Positive outcomes on clinical tutoring are likely; especially on feedback and clinical reasoning, where improvements are needed.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.