Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40415693›Full record

ArticleMolecular ecology resources2025

The Impact of Whole-Animal Fluid Preservation on the Observed Gut Microbiome of Vertebrates: Implications for the Use of Museum Specimens in Microbiome Research.

Samantha S Fontaine, Stevie R Kennedy-Gold, Kurt J Regester, Jennifer A Sheridan, Kevin D Kohl

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Molecular ecology resources, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Samantha S FontaineDepartment of Biological Sciences, Kent State University, Kent, Ohio, USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2448-8800
Stevie R Kennedy-GoldSection of Amphibians and Reptiles, Carnegie Museum of Natural History, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, USA.
Kurt J RegesterDepartment of Biology, Earth and Environmental Sciences, Pennsylvania Western University Clarion, Clarion, Pennsylvania, USA.
Jennifer A SheridanSection of Amphibians and Reptiles, Carnegie Museum of Natural History, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, USA.
Kevin D KohlDepartment of Biological Sciences, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, USA.

Funding

University of PittsburghUniversity of Pittsburgh's Pymatuning Laboratory of Ecology Pape Endowment Award
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The vertebrate gut houses diverse microbial communities that provide insights into their host's ecological and evolutionary histories. Nevertheless, microbiome research has not been distributed equally across host taxonomy, geography and timescales. The millions of fluid-preserved specimens stored in natural history museums worldwide represent a potentially untapped resource for microbiome information. However, it is unknown how fluid preservation and long-term storage change the composition and diversity of the original microbial community across a variety of host taxa. Here, we present the largest study to date aimed at addressing this question. Specifically, we identified an optimal method for extracting DNA from preserved samples using commercially available kits. Next, for 11 host species representing four vertebrate classes, we compared the gut microbiomes between animals dissected freshly and those collected simultaneously but subsequently fixed in formalin and stored in 70% ethanol for 1 year, similar to museum conditions. In a secondary analysis in amphibians, we compared our collected samples with those from decades-old historical museum specimens. We found that while fluid preservation altered the community composition and reduced the diversity of the recovered microbiome inventories, host species identity predominated in shaping the gut microbiome, and differences across species and geographic localities were retained after preservation. Historical specimens had microbiomes that were the most different from fresh specimens, suggesting that over time, changes in the microbiome of populations have occurred, or preservation effects have compounded. Considering these findings, we discuss the potential for use of fluid-preserved museum specimens in future microbiome studies.

Indexed as

Gastrointestinal MicrobiomePreservation, BiologicalSpecimen HandlingVertebratesAnimalsBacteriaDNA, BacterialMuseumsRNA, Ribosomal, 16SDNA, BacterialRNA, Ribosomal, 16SDNA extraction methodsgut microbiomemuseum specimenssample storage

Identifiers

PMID40415693
PMCPMC12415941

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.