Evidence mapPaperPMID 40416068Full record

ReviewPublic health reviews2025

Are Wearables Effective in LMICs?

Malika Sachdeva, Adeline Dugerdil, Antoine Flahault, Verena Carrara

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Public health reviews, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Malika SachdevaFaculté de Médecine, Institut de Santé Globale, Université de Genève, Geneva, Switzerland.
Adeline DugerdilFaculté de Médecine, Institut de Santé Globale, Université de Genève, Geneva, Switzerland.
Antoine FlahaultFaculté de Médecine, Institut de Santé Globale, Université de Genève, Geneva, Switzerland.
Verena CarraraFaculté de Médecine, Institut de Santé Globale, Université de Genève, Geneva, Switzerland.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Objectives: To provide an overview of research conducted in low- and middle-income countries that present the impact of wearables on non-communicable diseases' health outcomes, and factors that influence the adoption of wearables in these countries. Methods: We conducted a scoping review following the Arksey and O'Malley framework. Two databases, PubMed and Web of Science, were searched for relevant articles published between January 2010 and June 2023. We included studies set in low- and middle-income countries that focused either on the impact of wearables on changes in body mass index, blood pressure, and glycated hemoglobin levels or on the factors influencing wearables adoption. Results: A total of seventeen studies were included in the review out of the 890 identified during the search. Our findings suggest that wearables might be effective in improving health outcomes, such as body-mass-index and diastolic blood pressure, especially when used in conjunction with other health interventions. Conclusion: Wearables such as pedometers can be effective in improving health outcomes. Their widespread use in low- and middle-income countries is limited by different factors, including technological literacy, network coverage, and cultural considerations.

Indexed as

LMICsnon-communicable diseasespedometerssmartwatcheswearables

Identifiers

PMID40416068
PMCPMC12098041

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.