ReviewFrontiers in nutrition2025
Protective nutrition strategy in the acute phase of critical illness: why, what and how to protect.
Review in Frontiers in nutrition, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed.
- Effect of an Integrated Early Enteral Nutrition Management Protocol on Nutritional Target Attainment in Mechanically Ventilated ICU Patients: A Quasi-Experimental Study Guided by the MRC Framework.Nursing in critical care · 2026Article
- Impact of early post-pyloric feeding during therapeutic hypothermia on outcomes in patients with traumatic brain injury: a retrospective cohort study.Frontiers in medicine · 2026Article
- Enteral Nutrition in Critical Care: Pathogenesis, Complications, and the Therapeutic Promise of Mediterranean-Style Diets.Current gastroenterology reports · 2025Review
- Modifying feeding protocols in critically ill patients based on a predictive model of feeding intolerance: protocol for a multicenter cluster randomized controlled trial (the mNEED study).Frontiers in medicine · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Nutritional support is crucial for critically ill patients. Recent clinical studies suggest that both overfeeding during the acute phase of critical illness and overly conservative or delayed nutritional therapy can pose significant risks. Given substantial individual variability among critically ill patients, it is challenging to prescribe universally applicable and objective feeding strategies; Instead, we pointed out which nutritional interventions were harmful. We also summarized the reasons for protective nutrition, and elaborated the advantages of protective nutrition from three perspectives: gastrointestinal protection, nutritional protection and metabolic protection. In particular, it is emphasized that overfeeding will lead to metabolic disorders, such as mitochondrial dysfunction, autophagy inhibition, ketogenic inhibition, hyperglycemia, insulin resistance, etc. These detrimental processes can exacerbate one another, contributing to multiple organ dysfunction syndrome and poorer clinical outcomes. We also propose protective nutrition strategies comparable to lung protective ventilation strategies, which may benefit patients. Vigilant monitoring during nutritional implementation is also paramount, enhancing awareness of adverse events for early diagnosis and intervention to mitigate their harm.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.