Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40416376›Full record

ReviewFrontiers in nutrition2025

Protective nutrition strategy in the acute phase of critical illness: why, what and how to protect.

Youquan Wang, Yanhua Li, Nan Li, Yuting Li, Hongxiang Li, Dong Zhang

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Frontiers in nutrition, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Youquan WangDepartment of Critical Care Medicine, The First Hospital of Jilin University, Changchun, China.
Yanhua LiDepartment of Critical Care Medicine, The First Hospital of Jilin University, Changchun, China.
Nan LiDepartment of Critical Care Medicine, The First Hospital of Jilin University, Changchun, China.
Yuting LiDepartment of Critical Care Medicine, The First Hospital of Jilin University, Changchun, China.
Hongxiang LiDepartment of Critical Care Medicine, The First Hospital of Jilin University, Changchun, China.
Dong ZhangDepartment of Critical Care Medicine, The First Hospital of Jilin University, Changchun, China.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Nutritional support is crucial for critically ill patients. Recent clinical studies suggest that both overfeeding during the acute phase of critical illness and overly conservative or delayed nutritional therapy can pose significant risks. Given substantial individual variability among critically ill patients, it is challenging to prescribe universally applicable and objective feeding strategies; Instead, we pointed out which nutritional interventions were harmful. We also summarized the reasons for protective nutrition, and elaborated the advantages of protective nutrition from three perspectives: gastrointestinal protection, nutritional protection and metabolic protection. In particular, it is emphasized that overfeeding will lead to metabolic disorders, such as mitochondrial dysfunction, autophagy inhibition, ketogenic inhibition, hyperglycemia, insulin resistance, etc. These detrimental processes can exacerbate one another, contributing to multiple organ dysfunction syndrome and poorer clinical outcomes. We also propose protective nutrition strategies comparable to lung protective ventilation strategies, which may benefit patients. Vigilant monitoring during nutritional implementation is also paramount, enhancing awareness of adverse events for early diagnosis and intervention to mitigate their harm.

Indexed as

acute mesenteric ischemiacritical illnessenteral nutritionfeeding intolerancefeeding strategyintensive carerefeeding syndrome

Identifiers

PMID40416376
PMCPMC12098084

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.