ArticleRisk management and healthcare policy2025
Analysis of the Coupled Coordination of Digital Economy and Public Health Services in China and Its Influencing Factors.
Article in Risk management and healthcare policy, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed.
- Coupling Coordination Analysis of Medical Service Capacity, Residents' Health Level and Regional Economic Development in China.Healthcare (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
- Measuring Digital Transformation in Chinese Hospitals: Development and Validation of a Digital Maturity Evaluation Framework.Journal of medical systems · 2026Article
- The coupling coordination between digital village construction and rural healthcare service efficiency in China: dynamic evolution, spatial difference and driving factors.Frontiers in public health · 2025Article
- Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: The coordinated development of the digital economy and public health services is essential for integrating the "Digital China" and "Healthy China" strategies and accelerating the modernization of the public health system. However, substantial regional disparities persist, necessitating a systematic evaluation of the coupling and coordination between these two domains, along with the identification of key influencing factors to support evidence-based policymaking. Methods: This study utilizes panel data from 30 Chinese provinces spanning 2012-2021. The entropy-weighted Technique for Order Preference by Similarity to Ideal Solution (TOPSIS) method is employed to quantify the levels of digital economy development and public health services. A coupling coordination model is employed to evaluate the degree of coordinated development between these sectors, whereas a panel Tobit model serves to identify the key influencing factors. Results: The overall trajectory of China's digital economy and public health services exhibits an upward yet fluctuating trend. The degree of coupling coordination has progressed from a state of near imbalance to a marginally coordinated phase, although it remains relatively low. Spatially, the eastern regions exhibit a higher degree of coordination, whereas the central and western regions primarily experience imbalances characterized by a lagging digital economy. Furthermore, the coupling coordination degree demonstrates a significant spatial positive correlation. Economic development is identified as the primary driver of improved coordination, whereas factors such as population density and health status exert inhibitory effects to some extent. Conclusion: To enhance overall coordination and achieve regional balance, policymakers should tailor development strategies to local resource endowments, optimize the synergy between the digital economy and public health services, and refine collaborative mechanisms.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.