Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40417152›Full record

ArticleREC, interventional cardiology

The ultrathin-strut everolimus-eluting stent in a real-world population: the Everythin multicenter registry.

Juan Casanova-Sandoval, Gema Miñana-Escrivà, Eduard Bosch-Peligero, Juan Francisco Muñoz-Camacho, Diego Fernández-Rodríguez, Kristian Rivera, Agustín Fernández-Cisnal, Daniel Valcárcel-Paz, Marcos García-Guimarães

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in REC, interventional cardiology. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Juan Casanova-SandovalServicio de Cardiología, Hospital Universitario Arnau de Vilanova, Grup de Fisiologia i Patologia Cardiaca, Institut de Recerca Biomèdica de Lleida (IRBLleida), Lleida, España Servicio de Cardiología, Hospital Universitario Arnau de Vilanova Grup de Fisiologia i Patologia Cardiaca Institut de Recerca Biomèdica de Lleida (IRBLleida Lleida España.
Gema Miñana-EscrivàServicio de Cardiología, Hospital Clínico Universitario de Valencia, Instituto de Investigación Sanitaria (INCLIVA), Universidad de Valencia, Valencia, España Servicio de Cardiología, Hospital Clínico Universitario de Valencia Instituto de Investigación Sanitaria (INCLIVA) Universidad de Valencia Valencia España.
Eduard Bosch-PeligeroServicio de Cardiología, Hospital Universitari Parc Taulí de Sabadell, Universidad Autónoma de Barcelona, Barcelona, España Servicio de Cardiología Hospital Universitari Parc Taulí de Sabadell Universidad Autónoma de Barcelona Barcelona España.
Juan Francisco Muñoz-CamachoServicio de Cardiología, Hospital Universitario Mutua de Terrassa, Terrassa, Barcelona, España Servicio de Cardiología Hospital Universitario Mutua de Terrassa Terrassa España.
Diego Fernández-RodríguezServicio de Cardiología, Hospital Universitario Arnau de Vilanova, Grup de Fisiologia i Patologia Cardiaca, Institut de Recerca Biomèdica de Lleida (IRBLleida), Lleida, España Servicio de Cardiología, Hospital Universitario Arnau de Vilanova Grup de Fisiologia i Patologia Cardiaca Institut de Recerca Biomèdica de Lleida (IRBLleida Lleida España.
Kristian RiveraServicio de Cardiología, Hospital Universitario Arnau de Vilanova, Grup de Fisiologia i Patologia Cardiaca, Institut de Recerca Biomèdica de Lleida (IRBLleida), Lleida, España Servicio de Cardiología, Hospital Universitario Arnau de Vilanova Grup de Fisiologia i Patologia Cardiaca Institut de Recerca Biomèdica de Lleida (IRBLleida Lleida España.
Agustín Fernández-CisnalServicio de Cardiología, Hospital Clínico Universitario de Valencia, Instituto de Investigación Sanitaria (INCLIVA), Universidad de Valencia, Valencia, España Servicio de Cardiología, Hospital Clínico Universitario de Valencia Instituto de Investigación Sanitaria (INCLIVA) Universidad de Valencia Valencia España.
Daniel Valcárcel-PazServicio de Cardiología, Hospital Universitari Parc Taulí de Sabadell, Universidad Autónoma de Barcelona, Barcelona, España Servicio de Cardiología Hospital Universitari Parc Taulí de Sabadell Universidad Autónoma de Barcelona Barcelona España.
Marcos García-GuimarãesServicio de Cardiología, Hospital Universitario Arnau de Vilanova, Grup de Fisiologia i Patologia Cardiaca, Institut de Recerca Biomèdica de Lleida (IRBLleida), Lleida, España Servicio de Cardiología, Hospital Universitario Arnau de Vilanova Grup de Fisiologia i Patologia Cardiaca Institut de Recerca Biomèdica de Lleida (IRBLleida Lleida España.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Introduction and objectives: Ultrathin-strut stents (UTS) represent a significant advancement in percutaneous coronary intervention. This study aimed to evaluate the safety and short- to mid-term outcomes of stenting with the thinnest struts on the market (50 µm) using a biodegradable everolimus-eluting polymer (Evermine 50) in real-world patients with coronary artery disease. Methods: A single-arm, multicenter, prospective study was conducted in real-world patients. A total of 161 patients with de novo lesions who received at least 1 UTS stent were enrolled. The primary safety endpoint was the occurrence of major adverse cardiovascular events, defined as cardiac death, target-vessel myocardial infarction, or the need for revascularization of the target lesion at 12 months. The incidence of stent thrombosis at 12 months was also analyzed. Results: The study included 161 patients with a mean age of 64 ± 14 years; 79% were male, 34% had diabetes, and 66% had hypertension. The most common indication for intervention was non-ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction (42%), followed by ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction (22%). The procedural success rate was 100%. At 12 months of follow-up, the incidence of MACE was 2.5%, and the definite stent thrombosis rate was 1.3%. Conclusions: The use of the 50 µm UTS stent with a biodegradable everolimus-eluting polymer demonstrated a favorable safety profile and good clinical outcomes in unselected patients at 1 year of follow-up.

Indexed as

Coronary artery diseasePercutaneous coronary interventionUltrathin struts

Identifiers

PMID40417152
PMCPMC12097315

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.