ReviewFrontiers in cell and developmental biology2025
Mechanisms of the FLASH effect: current insights and advances.
Review in Frontiers in cell and developmental biology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 14 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
14 citing papers in PubMed.
- Towards FLASH Radiotherapy in Lung Cancer: A Review on Preclinical Evidence and Technical Feasibility.Cancers · 2026Review
- Ultra-high dose rate dependent modeling of plasmid DNA damage with TOPAS-nBio.Physics in medicine and biology · 2026Article
- DNA damage and cell death induced by exposure to ultra-high dose rate low-dose pulsed X-rays emitted from a kilojoule plasma focus device.Biological research · 2026Article
- Review
- Development and application ofPhysics and imaging in radiation oncology · 2026Article
- Ultra-intense pulsed source of ionizing radiation based on direct laser acceleration of electrons for studying the FLASH effect.Scientific reports · 2026Article
- Article
- Microenvironmental remodeling in FLASH radiotherapy.Frontiers in cell and developmental biology · 2026Review
- FLASH Radiotherapy in Lung Cancer: Translational Mechanisms, Preclinical Evidence, and Barriers.Cureus · 2026Review
- Review
- Effects and potential mechanisms of the ultra-high dose rate radiotherapy on lung injury: a review.Radiation oncology (London, England) · 2025Review
- Therapeutic targeting of cell death-immune crosstalk in cancer to rewire the tumor immune microenvironment.Molecular cancer · 2025Review
- Reactive Oxygen Species Yield near Gold Nanoparticles Under Ultrahigh-Dose-Rate Electron Beams: A Monte Carlo Study.Nanomaterials (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Article
- FLASH radiotherapy at a crossroads: a bibliometric perspective on progress and challenges.Discover oncology · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Radiotherapy is a fundamental tool in cancer treatment, utilized in over 60% of cancer patients during their treatment course. While conventional radiotherapy is effective, it has limitations, including prolonged treatment durations, which extend patient discomfort, and toxicity to surrounding healthy tissues. FLASH radiotherapy (FLASH-RT), an innovative approach using ultra-high-dose-rate irradiation, has shown potential in selectively sparing normal tissues while maintaining unaltered tumor control. However, the precise mechanisms underlying this "FLASH effect" remain unclear. This mini-review explores key hypotheses, including oxygen depletion, radical-radical interactions, mitochondrial preservation, differential DNA damage repair, and immune modulation. Oxygen levels significantly affect tissue response to radiation by promoting radical recombination, preserving mitochondrial function, and differentially activating DNA repair pathways in normal versus tumor tissues. However, the extent to which oxygen depletion contributes to the FLASH effect remains debated. Additionally, FLASH-RT may modulate the immune response, reducing inflammation and preserving immune cell function. To further enhance its therapeutic potential, FLASH-RT is increasingly being combined with complementary strategies such as radioprotectors, immunomodulators, and nanotechnology platforms. These combinations aim to amplify tumor control while further reducing normal tissue toxicity, potentially overcoming current limitations. Despite promising preclinical evidence, the exact mechanisms and clinical applicability of FLASH-RT require further investigation. Addressing these gaps is crucial for optimizing FLASH-RT and translating its potential into improved therapeutic outcomes for cancer patients. Continued research is essential to harness the full benefits of the FLASH effect, offering a paradigm shift in radiation oncology.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.