Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40417376›Full record

ReviewFrontiers in pain research (Lausanne, Switzerland)2025

From didactic explanations to co-design, sequential art and embodied learning: challenges, criticisms and future directions of patient pain education.

G Lorimer Moseley, Amelia Mardon, James Watson, Felicity Braithwaite, Monique V Wilson, Trevor Barker, James Lawrence, Dianne Sheppard, Michiel F Reneman, Jennifer Stinson and 1 more

Registry-linked trialAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Frontiers in pain research (Lausanne, Switzerland), 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT07743905 (Virtual Pain Neuroscience Education for Patients Undergoing Spinal Cord Stimulation), which is not on this map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT07743905 nanot yet recruitingnot on this mapstarted 2026, after this paper: background citation

Virtual Pain Neuroscience Education for Patients Undergoing Spinal Cord Stimulation: A Hybrid Effectiveness-Implementation Pilot Trial

TypeinterventionalSponsorUniversity of ArkansasRan2026 to 2028Enrolled50ConditionsChronic Pain, Chronic Pain Due to Injury, Failed Back Syndrome, Persistent Spinal Pain SyndromeArmsSCS-PNE intervention
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Canadian journal of pain = Revue canadienne de la douleur · 2026
    Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors.

G Lorimer MoseleyThe Pain Education Team to Advance Learning (PETAL) Collaboration.
Amelia MardonThe Pain Education Team to Advance Learning (PETAL) Collaboration.
James WatsonThe Pain Education Team to Advance Learning (PETAL) Collaboration.
Felicity BraithwaiteThe Pain Education Team to Advance Learning (PETAL) Collaboration.
Monique V WilsonThe Pain Education Team to Advance Learning (PETAL) Collaboration.
Trevor BarkerThe Pain Education Team to Advance Learning (PETAL) Collaboration.
James LawrenceConsumer Advisor, IIMPACT in Health, University of South Australia, Kaurna Country, Adelaide, SA, Australia.
Dianne SheppardMedHealth Research, MedHealth, Melbourne, VIC, Australia.
Michiel F RenemanThe Pain Education Team to Advance Learning (PETAL) Collaboration.
Jennifer StinsonThe Pain Education Team to Advance Learning (PETAL) Collaboration.
Cormac G RyanThe Pain Education Team to Advance Learning (PETAL) Collaboration.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Pain Neuroscience Education (PNE) emerged over two decades ago in response to the incoherence between evidence-based pain management strategies, and consumer and clinician understandings of "how pain works". Many clinical trials have investigated the effects of PNE either as a standalone intervention or embedded within a more complex care package, with mixed results. A range of research methods have been used to explore the inconsistent effects of PNE. Together they (i) identify significant shortcomings and limitations of PNE and (ii) raise the possibility that gaining a broadly scientifically accurate understanding of "how pain works" may be critical for subsequent pain and disability improvements. Both learnings strongly suggest that we need to do better. Extensive research incorporating several interest-holders has led to updated content and language and criticisms of both are addressed. The method of PNE has also been updated, with integration of educational frameworks, teaching strategies and tactics, patient resources and clinical tools that all aim to promote the likelihood that patients will learn key concepts and operationalise them to improve their pain, function and quality of life. Pain Science Education is used to differentiate the new approach from PNE.

Indexed as

back painchronic painconstructivismexplain painpain educationvirtual reality

Identifiers

PMID40417376
PMCPMC12098622

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.