ArticleAMIA ... Annual Symposium proceedings. AMIA Symposium2024
Translating Evidence-Based Guidelines Into Clinical Decision Support Tools to Improve Identification and Management of Familial Hypercholesterolemia.
Article in AMIA ... Annual Symposium proceedings. AMIA Symposium, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Evidence-based clinical guidelines serve to support clinical decision making, but implementing such guidelines into practice remains a challenge. Familial hypercholesterolemia (FH) is a high impact clinical condition that exemplifies this disconnect. Using implementation science methods, we designed clinical decision support tools embedded into the electronic health record, including a FH-focused electronic health record Smart Set and clinic note template, to improve the care of adult and pediatric patients at high-risk of FH. End-user feedback gathered through direct observations, semi-structured interviews, and deliberative engagement sessions was used to inform the development of the tools before and after pilot-testing. Clinicians desired comprehensive, guidelines-based tools that promoted collaborative care. During pilot testing, end-users provided insights into technical issues encountered with the tool's first iteration and suggested regular check-in sessions to monitor issues moving forward. This methodology can be used to surmount challenges that prevent the uptake of evidence-based guidelines into practice.
Indexed as
Identifiers
40417495PMC12099389What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.