Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40417529›Full record

ArticleAMIA ... Annual Symposium proceedings. AMIA Symposium2024

A Large Language Model Outperforms Other Computational Approaches to the High-Throughput Phenotyping of Physician Notes.

Syed I Munzir, Daniel B Hier, Chelsea Oommen, Michael D Carrithers

Abstract readComparative Study
In one paragraph

Article in AMIA ... Annual Symposium proceedings. AMIA Symposium, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Syed I MunzirDepartment of Neurology and Rehabilitation, University of Illinois at Chicago, Chicago, USA.
Daniel B HierDepartment of Neurology and Rehabilitation, University of Illinois at Chicago, Chicago, USA.
Chelsea OommenDepartment of Neurology and Rehabilitation, University of Illinois at Chicago, Chicago, USA.
Michael D CarrithersDepartment of Neurology and Rehabilitation, University of Illinois at Chicago, Chicago, USA.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

High-throughput phenotyping, the automated mapping of patient signs and symptoms to standardized ontology concepts, is essential for realizing value from electronic health records (EHR) in support of precision medicine. Despite technological advances, high-throughput phenotyping remains a challenge. This study compares three computational approaches to high-throughput phenotyping: a large language model (LLM) incorporating generative AI, a deep learning (DL) approach utilizing span categorization, and a machine learning (ML) approach with word embeddings. The LLM approach that implemented GPT-4 demonstrated superior performance, suggesting that large language models are poised to become the preferred method for high-throughput phenotyping ofphysician notes.

Indexed as

Electronic Health RecordsMachine LearningNatural Language ProcessingPhenotypeArtificial IntelligenceDeep LearningHumansLanguageLarge Language Models

Identifiers

PMID40417529
PMCPMC12099424

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.