ReviewIndian journal of thoracic and cardiovascular surgery2025
Common shunt lesions with pulmonary hypertension-who will benefit from surgery?
Review in Indian journal of thoracic and cardiovascular surgery, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Radiological assessment of pulmonary vascularity in congenital heart disease: standardized clinician assessment versus deep learning-based prediction.Journal of cardiovascular imaging · 2026Article
- Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Left to right shunts comprise a specific group of congenital heart disease, when identified and treated on time result in excellent outcomes. However, a proportion of these defects do not receive the timely intervention and often present late posing the question of safe operability especially in low- and middle-income countries. The lack of ample evidence and standardised guidelines often poses an enigma to the treating physician preventing appropriate and patient-friendly decision-making. Moreover, no single test or clinical feature can accurately define operability in this subset of patients. In this review, we aim to address this issue in a comprehensive and holistic manner and formulate a simplified guideline based on current evidence to help the physician to arrive at an appropriate decision. Graphical Abstract: ECG, electrocardiogram; L-R left to right.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.