ArticleInquiry : a journal of medical care organization, provision and financing
Validity of the Berg Balance Scale in Individuals With Spinal Cord Injury: A Rasch Analysis.
Article in Inquiry : a journal of medical care organization, provision and financing. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
- Erratum issued
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
This study aimed to determine whether the Korean version of the Berg Balance Scale (BBS) is suitable for assessing the balance ability of patients with spinal cord injury. The results of the Korean version of the BBS were collected from 80 patients with spinal cord injury. The collected data were analyzed using Rasch analysis to determine the suitability of participants and items, item difficulty, rating scale, and separation reliability. Of the 80 participants, 7 were evaluated as unsuitable participants, and 1 of 14 items was judged unsuitable. Item 7 was unfit, "standing unsupported with feet together." Item 14, "standing on 1 leg," was the most difficult, and item 3, "sitting unsupported," was the simplest. The results of the rating scale analysis showed that a four-point scale (0-3 points) was appropriate when administering the Korean version of the BBS to patients with spinal cord injury. The separation reliability for the items was 0.99, and the separation reliability for the participants was 0.97. The reliability and validity of the Korean version of the BBS were verified by applying Rasch analysis to patients with spinal cord injury. Based on the results of this study, the Korean version of the BBS is suitable for evaluating the balance ability of patients with spinal cord injury. It is expected to provide evidence for clinical use.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.