Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40418145›Full record

ReviewAugmentative and alternative communication (Baltimore, Md. : 1985)2025

Dismantling societal barriers that limit people who need or use AAC: lived experiences, key research findings, and future directions.

Janice Light, Susan K Fager, Jessica Gormley, Glenda Watson Hyatt, Erik Jakobs

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Augmentative and alternative communication (Baltimore, Md. : 1985), 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. An Examination of Context-Aware Augmentative and Alternative Communication with Automated Response Options for Academic Communication from Autistic Children.Journal of special education technology : a publication of Utah State University, the Association for Special Education Technology, and the Technology and Media Division of the Council for Exceptional Children · 2026
    Article
  5. Review
  6. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Janice LightThe Pennsylvania State University, University Park, PA, USA.ORCID 0000-0003-4449-798X
Susan K FagerThe University of Nebraska Medical Center, Munroe Meyer Institute, Omaha, NE, USA.ORCID 0000-0001-8125-5977
Jessica GormleyThe University of Nebraska Medical Center, Munroe Meyer Institute, Omaha, NE, USA.ORCID 0000-0001-5141-8421
Glenda Watson HyattQueen's University, Kingston, ON, Canada.ORCID 0000-0003-0235-3873
Erik JakobsThe Pennsylvania State University, University Park, PA, USA.ORCID 0000-0001-9196-9914

Funding

ACL HHS 90REGE0014
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Society generally, and communication partners specifically, wield substantial power in determining access to augmentative and alternative communication (AAC) tools and controlling the opportunities for participation afforded to people who cannot rely on speech alone to be heard and understood. This paper integrates the lived experiences of people who need or use AAC with key research findings related to policy, practice, technology, attitude, knowledge, and skill barriers in society that limit people who need or use AAC. Future research and technology development is urgently required to dismantle societal barriers to ensure access to AAC and meaningful opportunities to participate in all aspects of society - education, employment, healthcare, leisure, family, and community.

Indexed as

Communication BarriersCommunication Devices for People with DisabilitiesCommunication DisordersPersons with DisabilitiesHumansAACattitudespartner trainingpolicysocietal barrierstechnology

Identifiers

PMID40418145
PMCPMC13126884

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.