ReviewCurrent environmental health reports2025
A Critical Gap in Addressing Mental Health in Heat-Health Action Plans Worldwide.
Review in Current environmental health reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed.
- Heat, Brain, and Mental Health: Biological Mechanisms Underlying Climate-Related Psychiatric Outcomes.Biology · 2026Review
- Warm season hourly temperature and psychiatric emergencies: A case-crossover study of a vulnerable population in Boston, 2005-2019.Environmental epidemiology (Philadelphia, Pa.) · 2026Article
- Linking climate change, global mental health and structural interventions: opportunities for research and action.BJPsych open · 2026Article
- Climate resilience adaptation and psychiatric emergency services utilization during extreme heat in Boston, MA: a difference-in-differences analysis.Environment international · 2026Article
- Alcohol and substance use in extreme environment temperatures exposures, neural mechanisms, coping mechanisms, substance use disorders, and increased hospital visits.Frontiers in human neuroscience · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors.
Funding
Abstract
purpose of reviewExtreme heat is associated with mental health conditions such as suicide, anxiety, and substance use disorders. However, the integration of mental health in heat-health planning remains limited and no comprehensive assessment of its inclusion exists to date. This review aims to (1) identify and categorize mental health-related content in heat-health action plans globally; and (2) analyze the gaps in included interventions related to extreme heat and mental health. RECENT
findingsA review of 83 heat-health action plans from 24 countries revealed that while 75.9% of plans mentioned mental health, only 31.3% acknowledged its specific impacts and 21.7% included targeted interventions. These plans covered approximately 2.2 billion people, representing about 26% of the 2024 global population. Most interventions were directed at the societal level, with limited attention to individual or community-level support. Individuals with mental illness were commonly grouped with other vulnerable populations without tailored support. Low-income countries were not represented, while 44 plans (53.0%) came from high- and upper-middle-income countries. Among lower-middle-income countries, most plans originated from India (35; 89.7%). Despite recognition of the impacts of extreme heat on mental health, heat-health action plans lack comprehensive strategies to address these risks. The findings highlight a broader challenge within climate adaptation policies, where the recognition of mental health risks is often not matched by necessary resources, planning, and interventions. Given the critical gaps in mental health inclusion, greater efforts and resources are needed to integrate targeted mental health strategies into heat-health plans and policies.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.