ArticleEuropean journal of nutrition2025
Reproducibility and relative validity of a quantitative food frequency questionnaire developed for adults in the coastal area of southeast China.
Article in European journal of nutrition, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed.
- A Modular Digital FFQ for Tibetan Highlanders in Agricultural and Pastoral Communities: Development and Rigorous Multi-Method Validation.Nutrients · 2026Article
- Validation of a semi-quantitative Food Frequency Questionnaire for dietary assessment among adults in Northwest China.Frontiers in nutrition · 2026Article
- Dietary patterns associated with hyperuricemia among the southeast coastal Chinese population.Frontiers in nutrition · 2025Article
- Dietary B-complex vitamins and sleep quality in relation to cognitive impairment among older adults: non-linear associations and evidence of additive interaction.Frontiers in nutrition · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
Abstract
purposeTo evaluate the reproducibility and validity of a 93-item food frequency questionnaire (FFQ) designed to assess usual dietary habits over the past year among adults in the southeast coastal region of China.
methodsQualified dietary data of 477 subjects (75.26% female, mean age = 59.7 years) were collected via two FFQs over approximately 15 months, alongside four 4-day 24-hour dietary recalls (24 h-DRs) at average intervals of four months. The analysis included 25 general nutrients, 14 particular nutrients and 12 food groups. Wilcoxon signed-rank test, correlation coefficients, cross-classification with weighted kappa statistic and Bland-Altman plots were used for comparison.
resultsFor reproducibility, the Spearman, Pearson, and intraclass correlation coefficients between two FFQs ranged from 0.24 to 0.53, 0.21 to 0.53 and 0.19 to 0.53, respectively. After adjusting for energy intake, most coefficients either decreased or remained unchanged. The rates of agreement in classifying subjects in the same or adjacent quartile fell between 62% and 84% for both FFQs. Regarding validity, the crude Spearman, energy-adjusted and de-attenuated Pearson correlation coefficients between FFQs and 24 h-DRs ranged from 0.17 to 0.59, 0.12 to 0.54, and 0.13 to 0.57, respectively. Over 58% of subjects were classified into the same and adjacent categories by both methods. Weighted kappa statistic and Bland-Altman plots demonstrated acceptable concordance.
conclusionThe FFQ developed for adults in the specific coastal region of China, aiming to be used in a population-based cohort study, demonstrates acceptable reproducibility and validity to measure the dietary intakes of certain nutrients and foods.
Indexed as
Identifiers
40418397What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.