Trial reportJournal of medical Internet research2025
The Impact of Internet Hospital Follow-Up on the Quality of Life of Patients With Epilepsy: Randomized Controlled Trial.
Trial report in Journal of medical Internet research, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
11 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundAs the second most common neurological disorder, epilepsy requires long-term management to ensure better seizure control and improved patient outcomes. Health education and sustained care significantly help people with epilepsy manage their condition effectively. Internet hospitals (IHs) have emerged as a promising approach to enhancing health care accessibility. These digital platforms can significantly improve the quality of life for patients with epilepsy. However, despite their growing adoption, research on the application of IHs in the follow-up management of epilepsy remains limited, highlighting the need for further investigation.
objectiveThis study has 2 primary aims. The first aim was to assess and compare the differences in quality of life, anxiety, and depression between IH follow-up and traditional outpatient follow-up for patients with epilepsy. The second aim was to explore chronic disease management models that are tailored to meet the needs of patients with epilepsy, improving their overall care.
methodsEligible patients diagnosed with epilepsy were recruited at Sichuan Provincial People's Hospital and randomly assigned to the intervention or control group. Data collected included demographic information, clinical characteristics, and scores from the Quality of Life in Epilepsy-31 (QOLIE-31), Generalized Anxiety Disorder-7 Scale (GAD-7), and Neurological Disorders Depression Inventory for Epilepsy (NDDI-E). The control group received traditional outpatient follow-up, while the intervention group was managed via the IH. Both groups received epilepsy health education. After 6 months, changes in quality of life, anxiety, and depression were assessed using the same scales. Data analysis followed the intention-to-treat principle, and a linear mixed model was used to examine the intervention effect on primary and secondary outcomes. The effect sizes of group differences were calculated using Hedges g (0.2-0.4: small, 0.5-0.7: medium, and ≥0.8: large).
resultsA total of 214 patients with epilepsy participated in the study (intervention group: N=107; control group: N=107). At the end of the study, 94.4% (101/107) in the intervention group and 93.5% (100/107) in the control group had completed the follow-up visits. After the intervention, the intention-to-treat analysis revealed evidence for improved quality of life (QOLIE-31 total score; F
conclusionsLong-term follow-up through IHs can effectively improve the quality of life and reduce anxiety and depression in patients with epilepsy. This model provides effective support, making it an important tool for managing epilepsy. Therefore, IH management is recommended as a feasible approach for epilepsy follow-up in clinical practice.
trial registrationChinese Clinical Trial Registry ChiCTR2500101061; https://www.chictr.org.cn/showprojEN.html?proj=260855.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.