ArticleExperimental physiology2025
Exploring the respiratory efficacy of combined chronic glucocorticoid and antioxidant interventions in the mdx mouse: The PREDNAC trial.
Article in Experimental physiology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Neuromuscular and neuromechanical assessments of respiratory performance in the mdx mouse model of Duchenne muscular dystrophy across the natural history of disease.Experimental physiology · 2026Article
- Exploring the respiratory efficacy of combined chronic glucocorticoid and antioxidant interventions in the mdx mouse: The PREDNAC trial.Experimental physiology · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Duchenne muscular dystrophy (DMD) is characterized by respiratory muscle injury and weakness, ultimately leading to respiratory failure. Impaired respiratory muscle performance, fibrosis and inflammation in early disease are evident in the dystrophin-deficient mdx mouse model of DMD. Prednisone or similar treatment is the current standard of care for DMD and exerts its benefits via an anti-inflammatory action, but chronic treatment is associated with side-effects. A recent study demonstrated improved function in mdx limb muscle with weekly glucocorticoid treatment compared with daily treatment. Herein, we investigated the effect of weekly α-methylprednisolone (PRED) treatment alone and the effect of PRED in combination with daily intake of the antioxidant N-acetyl cysteine, NAC (PREDNAC) on respiratory performance. One-month-old male mdx mice received PRED (0.8 mg/kg methylprednisolone i.p. weekly) or PREDNAC (0.8 mg/kg methylprednisolone i.p. weekly and 1% NAC in drinking water daily) for 3 months. At 4 months of age, conscious breathing was measured in vivo by whole-body plethysmography. Under urethane general anaesthesia, respiratory EMG and inspiratory pressure were measured at baseline and during maximal activity. The intrinsic force-generating capacity of the diaphragm was determined ex vivo. Neither PRED nor PREDNAC influenced breathing or diaphragm force-generating capacity in mdx mice. There was a significant increase in diaphragm and parasternal EMG activity, but inspiratory pressure was unchanged with treatment. We conclude that neither PRED nor PREDNAC has a major beneficial effect on respiratory system performance in the mdx mouse model of DMD. Weekly administration of glucocorticoids is inadequate to protect respiratory performance in mdx mice, which might reflect the higher duty cycle of respiratory muscles compared with limb muscles.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.