Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40418805›Full record

ArticleJournal of participatory medicine2025

Understanding the Experiences of Patients With Pancreatic Cancer: Quantitative Analysis of the Pancreatic Cancer Action Network Patient Registry.

Allison Rosenzweig, Sydney Rathjens, Kawther Abdilleh, Dennis Ladnier, Fatima Zelada-Arenas, Sudheer Doss, Lynn M Matrisian

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of participatory medicine, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Allison Rosenzweig *Pancreatic Cancer Action Network, 2101 Rosecrans Ave, Suite 3200, El Segundo, CA, 90245, United States, 1 310-725-0025.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-1987-2725
Sydney Rathjens *Pancreatic Cancer Action Network, 2101 Rosecrans Ave, Suite 3200, El Segundo, CA, 90245, United States, 1 310-725-0025.ORCID http://orcid.org/0009-0003-1839-2305
Kawther AbdillehPancreatic Cancer Action Network, 2101 Rosecrans Ave, Suite 3200, El Segundo, CA, 90245, United States, 1 310-725-0025.ORCID http://orcid.org/0009-0001-5316-9366
Dennis LadnierPancreatic Cancer Action Network, 2101 Rosecrans Ave, Suite 3200, El Segundo, CA, 90245, United States, 1 310-725-0025.ORCID http://orcid.org/0009-0004-9991-2196
Fatima Zelada-ArenasPancreatic Cancer Action Network, 2101 Rosecrans Ave, Suite 3200, El Segundo, CA, 90245, United States, 1 310-725-0025.ORCID http://orcid.org/0009-0004-1546-1771
Sudheer DossPancreatic Cancer Action Network, 2101 Rosecrans Ave, Suite 3200, El Segundo, CA, 90245, United States, 1 310-725-0025.ORCID http://orcid.org/0009-0006-6197-5436
Lynn M MatrisianPancreatic Cancer Action Network, 2101 Rosecrans Ave, Suite 3200, El Segundo, CA, 90245, United States, 1 310-725-0025.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-5631-2826

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: The Pancreatic Cancer Action Network (PanCAN) established its Patient Registry to gather real-world data from patients with pancreatic cancer and their caregivers, related to their diagnosis, symptoms and symptom management, treatments, and more. Results from version 2 of the PanCAN Registry are presented here. Objective: We sought to gather and evaluate patient-reported outcomes data inputted into the PanCAN Patient Registry from December 2020 to January 2024. Statistical analyses were used to identify findings from a relatively small sample size (271 participants, as defined by people who filled out the Basics survey of the PanCAN Registry). Methods: Participation in the PanCAN Patient Registry was voluntary, and participants filled out an electronic consent form before joining the registry. Participants were identified through the PanCAN Patient Services Help Line or navigated to the registry directly via the PanCAN website. Data analysis took place via bivariate analysis using the chi-square test for categorical variables. Statistical significance was defined as a P value of <.05, with P values between .05 and .1 considered marginally significant, and P values >.1 considered insignificant. Results: Pain was reported by 186 out of the 207 (89.9%) PanCAN Patient Registry participants who filled out the pain-related questions in the General Assessment survey. We observed a marginally significant (P=.06) difference between the reporting of pain by patients aged younger than 65 years (86/92, 93.5%) and those aged 65 years or older (66/78, 84.6%). Depression was also a common condition experienced by patients with pancreatic cancer, with 64/103 (62.1%) indicating that they were experiencing or had experienced depression during the course of their illness. A trend suggested that depression was more frequently reported among the subset of patients who also reported pain (53/80, 66.3%) compared with those who did not report pain (5/13, 38.5%; P=.07). Conclusions: The use of patient-reported outcomes and real-world data for patients with pancreatic cancer has the potential to have direct impact on clinical practice. Through a relatively small sampling of patients, trends were identified that suggest a higher reporting of pain amongst patients in a younger age group as well as concurrence of pain and depression. These findings underscore the importance of a multidisciplinary team of health care professionals addressing patients' needs beyond the treatment of their cancer.

Indexed as

cancercancer patientdata collectiondepressionhealth statuspainpancreaticpancreatic cancerpatient experiencepatient outcomespatient registrypatient-reported outcomesregistrystatistical analysessurveywell-being

Identifiers

PMID40418805
PMCPMC12149456

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.