SynthesisAdvances in nutrition (Bethesda, Md.)2025
The Effect of Red Meat Consumption on Circulating, Urinary, and Fecal Trimethylamine-N-Oxide: A Systematic Review and Narrative Synthesis of Randomized Controlled Trials.
Synthesis in Advances in nutrition (Bethesda, Md.), 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Review
- Gut metabolites: key factors in the cross-talk between the gut microbiota and tumor immunotherapy.Frontiers in immunology · 2026Review
- Classification of intestinal inflammation driven by gut microbiota metabolites: a new paradigm for precision treatment of cardiovascular diseases.Frontiers in microbiology · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Cardiovascular concerns exist about the effect of red meat on circulating concentrations of trimethylamine N-oxide (TMAO), an emerging cardiovascular disease risk factor. The aim was to conduct a systematic review of randomized controlled trials (RCTs) to evaluate the effect of higher red meat intake, compared with lower intake, on circulating, urinary, and fecal TMAO concentrations in generally healthy adults and/or adults with stable chronic diseases. A systematic literature search was conducted using PubMed, the Cochrane Collaboration Library, and Web of Science. RCTs examining the effect of a ≥7-d dietary intervention featuring red meat on urinary, fecal, and/or circulating (plasma or serum) concentrations of TMAO in adults (≥18 y) were included. Eligible trials had a comparator group/condition that was exposed to a dietary intervention for ≥ 7 d lower in red meat and featuring white meat, fish, eggs, dairy, or plant-based protein sources. In total, 375 publications were identified. Fifteen publications reporting the results of 13 RCTs (n = 553; median duration 28 d), including 15 diet comparisons, were eligible. In 6 comparisons, higher circulating or urinary TMAO concentrations were observed after higher red meat intake (∼71-420 g/d) compared with comparator conditions lower in red meat. In 7 comparisons, no differences in serum/plasma TMAO concentrations were observed with higher red meat-containing diets (∼60-156 g/d) compared with diets lower in red meat. Two comparisons showed that consuming higher red meat diets lowered TMAO concentrations after 28 d compared with lower red meat diets containing seafood. In short-term studies (median duration of 28 d), higher red meat intake had inconsistent effects on circulating and urinary TMAO concentrations. Further high-quality research on red meat-related TMAO modulation, including effect magnitude and clinical relevance, is needed. This study was registered at Prospective Register of Systematic Reviews (PROSPERO) as CRD42023396799.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.