ReviewInternational wound journal2025
Applying Antimicrobial Strategies in Wound Care Practice: A Review of the Evidence.
Review in International wound journal, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
7 citing papers in PubMed.
- Bioactive Hydrogel-MOF Composites as Resistance-Modulating Wound Interfaces: Molecular Mechanisms and Rational Design for Chronic Wound Management.Gels (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Review
- Arginine-substituted Mastoparan-C derivatives combat dual bacterial pathogens:Microbiology spectrum · 2026Article
- Outpatient Cutaneous Wound Care in the United States: Specialty Distribution and Antimicrobial Prescribing Patterns.Antibiotics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
- Bacterial pathogen spectrum and antimicrobial resistance in positive pus cultures from hospitalized patients at a maternal and child healthcare specialty hospital in Shenzhen, China, 2021-2025.Frontiers in cellular and infection microbiology · 2026Article
- Linking chemical-composition to antimicrobial efficacy: development of an essential oil-based topical gel prototype.Applied microbiology and biotechnology · 2025Article
- Postbiotics as microbial-derived therapeutics for wound healing disorders: from molecular mechanisms to future application.Cell communication and signaling : CCS · 2025Review
- An Update of Phytotherapeutic Advances of Marigold (Plants (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Antimicrobial resistance is increasing due to an overreliance on antimicrobials to treat and manage infections. Chronic wounds are particularly vulnerable to infections and harbour complex microbial communities, increasing the risk of secondary infections caused by antimicrobial resistant bacteria. Accurate and early diagnosis of infection ensures appropriate treatment interventions and a reduction in the likelihood that antibiotic use is required. Despite this, the overuse of antibiotic treatment in wound care is still evident. Antimicrobial stewardship describes a structured approach to managing antimicrobial resistance through educating healthcare professionals about antimicrobial use to improve patient outcomes and minimise the spread of infections. However, the evidence suggests that healthcare professionals experience barriers when attempting to implement such strategies in their practice. It is essential that the principles of antimicrobial stewardship are embedded into wound care treatment and management. This review aimed to explore the current barriers to antimicrobial stewardship in wound care clinical practice and discuss the strategies that can be applied to successfully maximise infection prevention. There is a need to further educate wound care practitioners about antimicrobial stewardship and future research should concentrate on understanding how healthcare professionals can work collaboratively to implement such strategies in their practice.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.