ArticleScientific reports2025
Improving maintenance efficiency and controlling costs in healthcare institutions through advanced analytical method.
Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Article
- A risk-stratified framework for in-house PLA 3D printing of non-critical medical device spare parts: a cost-effectiveness analysis.Frontiers in medicine · 2026Article
- Retrospective analysis of dental chair failures and usage patterns in academic dental clinics.Scientific reports · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
Abstract
This study aims to address the shortage of manpower and resources in the medical engineering departments of healthcare institutions while efficiently executing medical equipment maintenance and achieving controllable maintenance costs. In the absence of historical maintenance data, this research uses multi-parameter monitors as a case study. The methodology integrates Fault Tree Analysis (FTA) with the Fuzzy Analytic Hierarchy Process (FAHP) to combine expert judgments and address uncertainties in failure data. The results of this integration are then converted into a Bayesian Network (BN) for probabilistic reasoning and failure analysis. This comprehensive approach enables both qualitative and quantitative analysis of monitor failures across different usage stages (early, mid-term, and late). The analysis encompasses determining the failure probability at each stage, identifying high-risk components, examining the transition of failure modes, gaining insights into the aging characteristics of components, and developing preventive maintenance strategies. A cost-benefit analysis is conducted based on specific practical cases. This methodology successfully identified the failure probability of each component of the monitor at various stages, accurately pinpointed high-risk components, and provided a clear analysis of the transition of failure modes. Following one year of practical application, a significant reduction in costs was observed after implementing this method. The proposed approach effectively addresses the issue of low maintenance efficiency of medical equipment stemming from inadequate manpower and resources. It is particularly advantageous for healthcare institutions in developing countries and smaller medical facilities, significantly enhancing maintenance efficiency while controlling maintenance costs.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.