ArticleMedicine2025
Causal association of cathepsins and endometriosis: A Mendelian randomization study.
Article in Medicine, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Endometriosis is a prevalent reproductive disorder that affects a significant number of women globally. Cathepsins, which are lysosomal cysteine proteases, contribute to several physiological and pathological processes, including the attachment and invasion of endometrial tissue. Nevertheless, the causal relationship between cathepsins and endometriosis remains undetermined. The aim of this study was to explore the potential relationship between cathepsins and endometriosis using genetic polymorphisms. We employed a 2-sample Mendelian randomization (MR) analysis (including inverse-variance weighted [IVW] method and reverse MR analysis) to investigate the causal association between 9 cathepsins and endometriosis. The IVW method provides efficient and robust causal estimates when genetic instruments are valid, making it the standard approach in MR analysis. And the reverse MR analysis ensures the robustness and directionality of causal inference. The univariable MR analysis results indicate that Cathepsin H increases the risk of overall endometriosis (IVW: OR [95%] = 1.037 [1.007 to 1.067], P = .013), endometriosis of ovary (IVW: OR [95%] = 1.022 [1.001 to 1.042], P = .046), endometriosis of pelvic peritoneum OR [95%] = 1.046 [1.002 to 1.089], P = .047), and deep endometriosis (IVW: OR [95%] = 1.050 [1.002 to 1.099], P = .048). The multivariable MR analysis retained stable after adjusting for other types of cathepsins. And reverse MR analyses suggest that overall endometriosis may lead to increased Cathepsin H levels (IVW: OR [95%] = 1.017 [1.003, 1.073], P = .041). The results of the sensitivity analyses were consistent with the main findings. Our MR analysis yields robust evidence supporting a causal relationship between Cathepsin H and the susceptibility to endometriosis, potentially inspiring directions in endometriosis diagnosis and treatment.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.