ArticleBMC medical imaging2025
Deep learning radiomics of left atrial appendage features for predicting atrial fibrillation recurrence.
Article in BMC medical imaging, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed.
- The Left Atrial Appendage: Anatomy, Electrophysiology, and Clinical Implications for Atrial Fibrillation and Stroke.Current cardiology reports · 2026Review
- CT-based radiomics to predict peri-device leakage after left atrial appendage closure.BMC medical imaging · 2026Article
- Novel predictors of late recurrence after catheter ablation for atrial fibrillation: from biomarkers to artificial intelligence models.Frontiers in cardiovascular medicine · 2026Review
- A computed tomography-based radiomics-clinical model incorporating left atrial and proximal pulmonary vein features predicts recurrence after radiofrequency catheter ablation of atrial fibrillation: a multicenter study.Frontiers in medicine · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundStructural remodeling of the left atrial appendage (LAA) is characteristic of atrial fibrillation (AF), and LAA morphology impacts radiofrequency catheter ablation (RFCA) outcomes. In this study, we aimed to develop and validate a predictive model for AF ablation outcomes using LAA morphological features, deep learning (DL) radiomics, and clinical variables.
methodsIn this multicenter retrospective study, 480 consecutive patients who underwent RFCA for AF at three tertiary hospitals between January 2016 and December 2022 were analyzed, with follow-up through December 2023. Preprocedural CT angiography (CTA) images and laboratory data were systematically collected. LAA segmentation was performed using an nnUNet-based model, followed by radiomic feature extraction. Cox proportional hazard regression analysis assessed the relationship between AF recurrence and LAA volume. The dataset was randomly split into training (70%) and validation (30%) cohorts using stratified sampling. An AF recurrence prediction model integrating LAA DL radiomics with clinical variables was developed.
resultsThe cohort had a median follow-up of 22 months (IQR 15-32), with 103 patients (21.5%) experiencing AF recurrence. The nnUNet segmentation model achieved a Dice coefficient of 0.89. Multivariate analysis showed that LAA volume was associated with a 5.8% increase in hazard risk per unit increase (aHR 1.058, 95% CI 1.021-1.095; p = 0.002). The model combining LAA DL radiomics with clinical variables demonstrated an AUC of 0.92 (95% CI 0.87-0.96) in the test set, maintaining robust predictive performance across subgroups.
conclusionLAA morphology and volume are strongly linked to AF RFCA outcomes. We developed an LAA segmentation network and a predictive model that combines DL radiomics and clinical variables to estimate the probability of AF recurrence.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.