Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40420015›Full record

ArticleBMC public health2025

Knowledge, attitudes, and practices toward ticks and tick-borne diseases: a cross-sectional study in Rwanda.

Abakundana Nsenga Ariston Gabriel, Xiao-Yang Wang, Guo-Yao Zu, Laila Jamil, Blaise Iraguha, Methode Ngabo Gasana, Bing-Bing Gu, Ntakirutimana Theoneste, Lin Zhao, Wu-Chun Cao

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC public health, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

Abakundana Nsenga Ariston GabrielInstitute of EcoHealth, School of Public Health, Cheeloo College of Medicine, Shandong University, Jinan, 250001, Shandong Province, P. R. China. abakundandagaby@gmail.com.
Xiao-Yang WangInstitute of EcoHealth, School of Public Health, Cheeloo College of Medicine, Shandong University, Jinan, 250001, Shandong Province, P. R. China.
Guo-Yao ZuInstitute of EcoHealth, School of Public Health, Cheeloo College of Medicine, Shandong University, Jinan, 250001, Shandong Province, P. R. China.
Laila JamilInstitute of EcoHealth, School of Public Health, Cheeloo College of Medicine, Shandong University, Jinan, 250001, Shandong Province, P. R. China.
Blaise IraguhaCollege of Veterinary Medicine, University of Illinois Urbana-champaign, Urbana-Champaign, IL, USA.
Methode Ngabo GasanaRwanda Agriculture and Animal Resources Development Board, Kigali, Rwanda.
Bing-Bing GuInstitute of EcoHealth, School of Public Health, Cheeloo College of Medicine, Shandong University, Jinan, 250001, Shandong Province, P. R. China.
Ntakirutimana TheonesteSchool of Public Health, College of Medicine and Health Sciences, University of Rwanda, Kigali, Rwanda.
Lin ZhaoInstitute of EcoHealth, School of Public Health, Cheeloo College of Medicine, Shandong University, Jinan, 250001, Shandong Province, P. R. China. zhaolin1989@sdu.edu.cn.
Wu-Chun CaoInstitute of EcoHealth, School of Public Health, Cheeloo College of Medicine, Shandong University, Jinan, 250001, Shandong Province, P. R. China. caowuchun@126.com.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundTicks and tick-borne diseases pose significant global risks to humans and animals, leading to economic losses and health threats. This study aimed to assess the knowledge, attitudes, and practices toward ticks and tick-borne diseases among adults in Rwanda.

methodsThe sample size was determined using a single-population proportion formula. Binary logistic regression was used to identify the factors influencing attitudes and practices. In contrast, multinomial logistic regression was applied to assess the factors affecting the level of knowledge about ticks and tick-borne diseases. Variables with a p-value < 0.05 were considered statistically significant.

resultsThis study included 377 participants, with an average age of 35.38 years and a standard deviation of 10.58. Most participants were male (56.2%) and lived in rural areas (51.7%). Nearly one-third (32.1%) were healthcare professionals. A significant proportion of the participants (64.7%) reported having prior tick bites, while 46.7% experienced related symptoms, and 41.4% had relatives affected by tick-borne diseases. The knowledge levels of the participants varied; 49% demonstrated a good understanding of ticks and TBDs. However, only 28% of the respondents reported positive attitudes towards tick-borne diseases, and 56% reported good preventive practices. Regression analyses indicated that participants aged 45 years or older had significantly greater odds of possessing moderate (AOR = 3.81, 95% CI: 0.001-2.6) and high knowledge (AOR = 5.24, 95% CI: 0.34-2.96) than younger participants. In contrast, males presented lower odds of having moderate knowledge (AOR = 0.43, 95% CI: 0.10-1.56) and high knowledge (AOR = 0.52, 95% CI: 0.81-1.37) than females did. Healthcare professionals were more likely to possess high knowledge (AOR = 3.24, 95% CI: 0.32-2.83) than those outside the healthcare field. Furthermore, positive attitudes were significantly associated with older age (AOR = 2.54, 95% CI: 1.137-5.654), urban residence (AOR = 0.56, 95% CI: 0.335-0.920), and living in western provinces (AOR = 0.38, 95% CI: 0.186-0.770). Notably, participants with moderate (AOR = 0.25, 95% CI: 0.109-0.582) or high knowledge (AOR = 0.17, 95% CI: 0.056-0.297) and positive attitudes (AOR = 0.53, 95% CI: 0.306-0.928) were at lower odds to engage in poor preventive practices. Conversely, urban residents had higher odds of exhibiting sub-optimal preventive practices (AOR = 1.79, 95% CI: 1.09-2.90) than their rural counterparts.

conclusionsOur study reveals key knowledge gaps and negative attitudes about ticks and TBDs in Rwanda, especially among youth, males, and urban populations. Targeted education, healthcare training, and community-driven surveillance are needed to improve prevention and monitoring. Strengthening TBD surveillance and integrating education into health programs will help reduce disease burden and enhance resilience, requiring multisectoral collaboration to safeguard public health.

Indexed as

Health Knowledge, Attitudes, PracticeTick-Borne DiseasesTicksAdultAnimalsCross-Sectional StudiesFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedRwandaSurveys and QuestionnairesYoung AdultAttitudesKnowledgePracticesRwandaTick-borne diseasesTicks

Identifiers

PMID40420015
PMCPMC12105182

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.