Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40420160›Full record

ArticleJournal of medical case reports2025

Robotic-assisted tendon transplantation-approach for pelvic organ prolapse repair: a case report.

Dominique Koensgen, Charlotte Lukannek, Carolin Schroeder, Lucia A Otten, Amadeus Hornemann, Alexander Mustea

Abstract readCase Reports
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of medical case reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Dominique KoensgenDepartment of Gynecology and Gynecological Oncology, University Hospital Bonn, Venusberg - Campus 1, 5312, Bonn, Germany. Dominique.Koensgen-Mustea@ukbonn.de.
Charlotte LukannekDepartment of Gynecology and Gynecological Oncology, University Hospital Bonn, Venusberg - Campus 1, 5312, Bonn, Germany.
Carolin SchroederDepartment of Gynecology and Gynecological Oncology, University Hospital Bonn, Venusberg - Campus 1, 5312, Bonn, Germany.
Lucia A OttenDepartment of Gynecology and Gynecological Oncology, University Hospital Bonn, Venusberg - Campus 1, 5312, Bonn, Germany.
Amadeus HornemannDepartment of Gynecology, Bürgerspital, Frankfurt Am Main, Germany.
Alexander MusteaDepartment of Gynecology and Gynecological Oncology, University Hospital Bonn, Venusberg - Campus 1, 5312, Bonn, Germany.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThe management of pelvic organ prolapse remains a clinical challenge, particularly with concerns regarding the safety of synthetic mesh-based procedures. In response, we present a novel approach for apical prolapse repair utilizing robotic assistance for tendon transplantation, offering a promising alternative to the use of synthetic meshes. CASE PRESENTATION: A 47-year-old multiparous woman (white, non-Hispanic) with a history of three vaginal deliveries and laparoscopic supracervical hysterectomy presented with symptoms of pelvic organ prolapse, including vaginal discomfort, recurrent urinary tract infections, and overactive bladder. Clinical examination and ultrasonography revealed a combined anterior and apical vaginal prolapse grade II according to the Pelvic Organ Prolapse Quantification system. A robotic sacrocervicopexy with a semitendinosus autograft, harvested from the left popliteal fossa, and concomitant anterior colporrhaphy were performed. The surgical procedure included the dissection of the ligamentum longitudinale using a nerve-sparing technique, cervix preparation, and tendon transplantation. The surgery lasted 172 min without intraoperative complications. The patient's postoperative recovery was swift without residual prolapse, voiding dysfunction, or urinary incontinence reported at any of the follow-up examinations, conducted at 8 weeks, 3 months, 6 months, and 1 year after the operation.

conclusionThis case report demonstrates the successful application of a robotic-assisted tendon transplantation approach for apical prolapse repair, offering a safe and effective alternative to synthetic mesh-based surgical procedures. An ongoing multicenter registry study aims to further validate the method's safety and efficacy, paving the way for its broader adoption in clinical practice.

Indexed as

Pelvic Organ ProlapseRobotic Surgical ProceduresTendonsFemaleHumansMiddle AgedTreatment OutcomeApical prolapse surgeryBiological graftCase reportPelvic organ prolapseRobotic-assisted surgerySynthetic meshTendon transplantation

Identifiers

PMID40420160
PMCPMC12108028

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.