Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40420221›Full record

ArticleHealth research policy and systems2025

Applying a participatory system dynamics approach to childhood overweight and obesity in the local context: reflections from the LIKE project.

Angie Luna Pinzon, Karien Stronks, Arnoud Verhoeff, David Vaandrager, Karen den Hertog, Wilma Waterlander

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Health research policy and systems, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Angie Luna PinzonAmsterdam UMC Location University of Amsterdam, Department of Public and Occupational Health, Amsterdam Public Health Research Institute, Meibergdreef 9, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
Karien StronksAmsterdam UMC Location University of Amsterdam, Department of Public and Occupational Health, Amsterdam Public Health Research Institute, Meibergdreef 9, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
Arnoud VerhoeffPublic Health Service (GGD), City of Amsterdam, Sarphati Amsterdam, Nieuwe Achtergracht 100, 1018 WT, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
David VaandragerAmsterdam UMC Location University of Amsterdam, Department of Public and Occupational Health, Amsterdam Public Health Research Institute, Meibergdreef 9, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
Karen den HertogDepartment of Healthy Living, City of Amsterdam, Public Health Amsterdam, 1018WT, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
Wilma WaterlanderAmsterdam UMC Location University of Amsterdam, Department of Public and Occupational Health, Amsterdam Public Health Research Institute, Meibergdreef 9, Amsterdam, The Netherlands. w.waterlander@amsterdamumc.nl.

Funding

Hartstichting CVON2016-07 LIKEZonMw CVON2016-07 LIKE
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundMethods based in system dynamics (SD) have gained prominence within public health research in recent years. SD is grounded in theory and explains how central principles, such as adaptation, dynamics and emergence can be used to understand and/or change complex systems. To date, few examples exist where this theory has been applied consistently in a prevention approach in a local context. This study aimed to reflect upon the application of theoretical SD principles in context of the Lifestyle Innovations Based on Youth Knowledge and Experience (LIKE) project.

methodsA multi-methods qualitative evaluation was conducted using the LIKE project, situated in Amsterdam, the Netherlands, as a case study. LIKE applied a participatory system dynamics approach for obesity prevention in youth, throughout the project during a time period of 6 years (2017-2023). Data collection included document reviews, a Ripple Effects Mapping workshop, and semi-structured interviews with involved stakeholders, followed by in-depth reflective analysis.

resultsWe identify three key lessons combining theory and practice: (1) theory: interdependency programme and context; lesson: avoid becoming overly focused on achieving a complete understanding of the system related to the topic under study (for example, obesity). Instead, ensure sufficient attention is given to comprehending the dynamics of the local context, including existing initiatives and policy processes; (2) theory: dynamic and adaptive character; lesson: while the ability to encompass real-world dynamics is a foundational strength of system dynamics theory, its practical application can be constrained by more static elements, such as budget planning, and the need for clearly defined roles and responsibilities; and (3) theory: strong governance; lesson: SD projects require strong governance including strategic planning and enduring commitment, but in the absence of clear milestones or measurable impact on the short term.

conclusionsApplying SD principles in practice requires a collective shift in thinking and working for all parties involved. Challenges in particular relate to the many uncertainties that arise whereby everything continues to change over time, including the focus of the system under study; relevant stakeholders; and momentum for change. This necessitates strategies different from our accustomed linear research working practices, shifting instead towards more iterative approaches that accommodate complexity and uncertainty.

Indexed as

Health PromotionOverweightPediatric ObesityAdolescentChildFemaleHumansLife StyleMaleNetherlandsPublic HealthQualitative ResearchCase studyEvaluationObesity preventionPublic healthSystem dynamicsSystems thinking

Identifiers

PMID40420221
PMCPMC12105373

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.