ArticleEuropean journal of medical research2025
The impact of personalized postoperative care plan on the compliance and long-term efficacy of minimally invasive periodontal surgery treatment recommendations.
Article in European journal of medical research, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
purposePeriodontal disease significantly affects oral health and contributes to adult tooth loss worldwide. Minimally invasive periodontal surgery (MIPS) aims to enhance outcomes while reducing postoperative discomfort. The efficacy of such surgeries largely depends on postoperative care. This study evaluates the effect of personalized postoperative care plans on patient compliance and outcomes compared to standard care. DESIGN AND
methodsA retrospective cohort study was conducted involving 118 patients who underwent MIPS between April 2022 and March 2024. Patients were divided into a control group receiving standard care (n = 67) and an intervention group receiving personalized care (n = 51). Procedures included structured assessments of compliance, gingival health, pain, anxiety, depression, and satisfaction using validated scales.
findingsPost-intervention, the personalized care group showed significantly improved gingival indices (BI, PLI, GI, SBI), compliance scores, and curative effect rates (p < 0.05). Pain (VAS score) and sensitivity were reduced (p < 0.05), alongside significant decreases in anxiety (SAS) and depression (SDS) scores (p < 0.01). Patient satisfaction rates were higher in the intervention group, with greater reports of 'very satisfied' experiences (p = 0.006). OHIP-14 scores indicated improved oral health quality in the personalized care group (p < 0.01).
conclusionPersonalized care enhances compliance and long-term efficacy of MIPS through tailored interventions addressing individual patient needs, leading to improved clinical and psychosocial outcomes.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.