Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40420280›Full record

ArticleJournal of neuroengineering and rehabilitation2025

Enhancing patient rehabilitation outcomes: artificial intelligence-driven predictive modeling for home discharge in neurological and orthopedic conditions.

Leonardo Buscarini, Paola Romano, Elena Sofia Cocco, Carlo Damiani, Sanaz Pournajaf, Marco Franceschini, Francesco Infarinato

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of neuroengineering and rehabilitation, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Leonardo BuscariniRehabilitation Bioengineering Laboratory, IRCCS San Raffaele Roma, 00166, Rome, Italy.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0000-7392-6515
Paola RomanoRehabilitation Bioengineering Laboratory, IRCCS San Raffaele Roma, 00166, Rome, Italy. paola.romano@sanraffaele.it.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-2441-135X
Elena Sofia CoccoNeurorehabilitation and Robotic Rehabilitation, Department of Neurological and Rehabilitative Sciences, IRCCS San Raffaele Roma, 00166, Rome, Italy.ORCID http://orcid.org/0009-0008-5825-5707
Carlo DamianiDepartment of Neurological and Rehabilitation Science, IRCCS San Raffaele Roma, Rome, Italy.
Sanaz PournajafNeurorehabilitation and Robotic Rehabilitation, Department of Neurological and Rehabilitative Sciences, IRCCS San Raffaele Roma, 00166, Rome, Italy.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-8749-2236
Marco FranceschiniNeurorehabilitation and Robotic Rehabilitation, Department of Neurological and Rehabilitative Sciences, IRCCS San Raffaele Roma, 00166, Rome, Italy.
Francesco InfarinatoRehabilitation Bioengineering Laboratory, IRCCS San Raffaele Roma, 00166, Rome, Italy.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-5570-8490

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

In recent years, the fusion of the medical and computer science domains has gained significant traction in the scientific research landscape. Progress in both fields has enabled the generation of a vast amount of data used for making predictions and identifying interesting clusters and pathways. The Machine Learning (ML) model's application in the medical domain is one of the most compelling and challenging topics to explore, bridging the gap between Artificial Intelligence (AI) and healthcare. The combination of AI and medical information offers the possibility to create tools that can benefit both healthcare providers and physicians. This enables the enhancement of rehabilitation therapy and patient care. In the rehabilitation context, this work provides an alternative perspective: prediction of patients' home discharge upon completing the rehabilitation protocol. Demographic and clinical data were collected on 7282 inpatients from electronic Medical Record, each record was categorized into Neurological Patients (NP, N = 3222) or Orthopedic Patients (OP, N = 4060). To identify the most suitable machine learning model, an extensive data preprocessing phase was conducted. This process involved variables recoding, scaling, and the evaluation of different dataset balancing methods to optimize model performance. Following a thorough review and comparison of algorithms commonly employed in the clinical-rehabilitative field, the Random Over Sampling (ROS) technique, in combination with the Random Forest (RF) machine learning model, was selected. Subsequently, a comprehensive hyperparameter tuning phase was performed using a grid search approach. The optimized model achieved an average accuracy of 98% for OP and 96% for NP, based on 10-fold cross-validation applied to the balanced training set (unrealistic scenario). When tested on the unbalanced dataset (real-world condition), the RF model maintained strong generalization performance, achieving 90% accuracy for OP and 83% for NP. This work points out the increasing importance of AI in medicine, especially in the realm of personalized rehabilitation. The use of such approaches could signify a transformative shift in healthcare. The integration of machine learning not only enhances the precision of treatment but also opens new possibilities for patient-centered care, improving outcomes and quality of care for individuals undergoing rehabilitation.

Indexed as

Artificial IntelligenceMachine LearningNervous System DiseasesNeurological RehabilitationPatient DischargeAdultAgedAlgorithmsElectronic Health RecordsFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedAccuracyClassification algorithmHyperparameters optimizationMachine learningPersonalized rehabilitationRandom forestUnbalance

Identifiers

PMID40420280
PMCPMC12105185

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.