ArticleNutrition & metabolism2025
Ultra-processed food intake, diet quality, and risk of gestational diabetes mellitus: a cross-sectional analysis from the Mutaba'ah study.
Article in Nutrition & metabolism, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundHigh intake of Ultra-Processed Foods (UPF) has raised concerns about how they might impact maternal diet and potentially increase the risk of Gestational Diabetes Mellitus (GDM). This study aimed to evaluate the associations between UPF intake or adherence to the Mediterranean Diet and GDM among pregnant women in the United Arab Emirates.
methodsPregnant women (n = 1054) from the dietary subcohort within the prospective Mutaba'ah Study cohort were included. Diet was assessed through a semi-quantitative food frequency questionnaire, and UPF intake in servings/day was classified according to the NOVA system. The alternate Mediterranean Diet (aMED) score specific for pregnancy defined adherence to the Mediterranean Diet. GDM diagnosis was based on the National Institute for Health and Clinical Excellence criteria. Logistic regression models adjusted for maternal age, first trimester body mass index, parity, gestational age, education level, employment status, physical activity, and husband's smoking status were used to assess associations between UPF intake or aMED score and GDM.
resultsMean ± SD UPF intake was 9.4 ± 3.4 servings/day and mean aMED score was 4.0 ± 1.5. Women in the highest tertile of UPF intake had lower aMED score than those in the lowest tertile (4.3 ± 1.4 vs. 3.6 ± 1.4, P < 0.001). Women in the highest tertile of UPF intake had higher intakes of carbohydrates, saturated fatty acids, sodium, and selenium than those in the lowest tertile, while intakes of protein, total fat, monounsaturated fatty acids, and most micronutrients were lower (P < 0.05). Neither tertiles of UPF intake (third tertile compared to the lowest OR = 0.85, 95% CI: 0.54-1.34) nor continuous UPF intake (OR = 0.97, 95% CI: 0.92-1.03) was associated with GDM. Similarly, aMED score was not associated with GDM in either tertile of the score (third tertile compared to the lowest OR = 0.94, 95% CI: 0.54-1.64) or as a continuous variable (OR = 0.99, 95% CI: 0.87-1.11).
conclusionsHigher intake of UPF was associated with a lower adherence to the Mediterranean Diet. However, neither UPF intake nor aMED score was associated with GDM.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.