SynthesisJournal of pediatric gastroenterology and nutrition2025
Effects of microbiota-based interventions on depression and anxiety in children and adolescents-A systematic review.
Synthesis in Journal of pediatric gastroenterology and nutrition, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- Effects of microbiota-based interventions on depression and anxiety in children and adolescents-A systematic review.Journal of pediatric gastroenterology and nutrition · 2025Pooled it
- Early Gut Microbiota and Neurodevelopmental Trajectories: Implications for Pediatric Neuropsychiatric Vulnerability-A Narrative Review.Nutrients · 2026Review
- Depression in Autism Spectrum Disorder: Neurobiological Convergence and Emerging Therapeutic Strategies.Biology · 2026Review
- Gut Microbiota Dysbiosis in Depression: Pathological Correlations, Molecular Pathways, and Therapeutic Interventions.International journal of molecular sciences · 2026Review
- The gut-brain-circadian axis in anxiety and depression: a critical review.Frontiers in psychiatry · 2025Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
Abstract
This study aims to systematically review evidence on gut microbiota-based interventions for reducing depression- and anxiety-like symptoms in children and adolescents with autism spectrum disorder, irritable bowel syndrome, Prader-Willi syndrome, below-average literacy skills or anorexia nervosa, where some individuals may exhibit indicators of depression or anxiety. This review includes evaluated evidence from randomized controlled trials (RCTs) involving children and adolescents aged 3-19 years, identified from PsycINFO, Medline (Ovid version), Web of Science, and the reference lists of existing reviews. Risk of bias were assessed using Risk of Bias Tool (RoB 2) in RevMan (version 5.4, Cochrane Collaboration). The results were qualitatively summarized by describing the main findings across the studies. Of the 1561 studies screened, 10 RCTs with 408 participants were included. Three gut microbiota-based interventions evaluated were probiotics, prebiotics, and dietary supplementation. Probiotics and dietary supplementation were identified as effective on reducing depression and anxiety in three studies; no significant effects were reported in the remaining seven studies. No evidence supported the effectiveness of prebiotics in reducing depression and anxiety in children and adolescents. Four studies presented low risk of bias, while others showed some bias in the randomization process, allocation concealment, selective reporting, and blinding of the outcome assessment. This review highlights the potential of probiotics and dietary supplements in treating depression and anxiety in children and adolescents. However, the current evidence is constrained by inadequate mental health measurements, participant heterogeneity, and small sample sizes in reviewed studies. Further well-designed studies are needed to confirm their effectiveness.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.