Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40420533›Full record

SynthesisJournal of pediatric gastroenterology and nutrition2025

Effects of microbiota-based interventions on depression and anxiety in children and adolescents-A systematic review.

Jiayu Hu, Yan Zhang, Chuwen Liu, Antigone Gkaravella, Jinyue Yu

Abstract readSystematic Review
In one paragraph

Synthesis in Journal of pediatric gastroenterology and nutrition, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Review
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Jiayu HuDepartment of Population, Policy & Practice, Childhood Nutrition Research Group, UCL Great Ormond Street Institute of Child Health, London, UK.
Yan ZhangMicrobiota Division, Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, The First Medical Center, Chinese PLA General Hospital, Beijing, China.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1214-7849
Chuwen LiuDepartment of Population, Policy & Practice, Childhood Nutrition Research Group, UCL Great Ormond Street Institute of Child Health, London, UK.
Antigone GkaravellaDepartment of Population, Policy & Practice, Childhood Nutrition Research Group, UCL Great Ormond Street Institute of Child Health, London, UK.
Jinyue YuDepartment of Population, Policy & Practice, Childhood Nutrition Research Group, UCL Great Ormond Street Institute of Child Health, London, UK.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5182-3232

Funding

None
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

This study aims to systematically review evidence on gut microbiota-based interventions for reducing depression- and anxiety-like symptoms in children and adolescents with autism spectrum disorder, irritable bowel syndrome, Prader-Willi syndrome, below-average literacy skills or anorexia nervosa, where some individuals may exhibit indicators of depression or anxiety. This review includes evaluated evidence from randomized controlled trials (RCTs) involving children and adolescents aged 3-19 years, identified from PsycINFO, Medline (Ovid version), Web of Science, and the reference lists of existing reviews. Risk of bias were assessed using Risk of Bias Tool (RoB 2) in RevMan (version 5.4, Cochrane Collaboration). The results were qualitatively summarized by describing the main findings across the studies. Of the 1561 studies screened, 10 RCTs with 408 participants were included. Three gut microbiota-based interventions evaluated were probiotics, prebiotics, and dietary supplementation. Probiotics and dietary supplementation were identified as effective on reducing depression and anxiety in three studies; no significant effects were reported in the remaining seven studies. No evidence supported the effectiveness of prebiotics in reducing depression and anxiety in children and adolescents. Four studies presented low risk of bias, while others showed some bias in the randomization process, allocation concealment, selective reporting, and blinding of the outcome assessment. This review highlights the potential of probiotics and dietary supplements in treating depression and anxiety in children and adolescents. However, the current evidence is constrained by inadequate mental health measurements, participant heterogeneity, and small sample sizes in reviewed studies. Further well-designed studies are needed to confirm their effectiveness.

Indexed as

AnxietyDepressionGastrointestinal MicrobiomeProbioticsAdolescentAnorexia NervosaAutism Spectrum DisorderChildChild, PreschoolDietary SupplementsFemaleHumansIrritable Bowel SyndromeMalePrader-Willi SyndromePrebioticsPrebioticsgut microbiomemental healthpsychobioticsyoung people

Identifiers

PMID40420533
PMCPMC12314587

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.