ArticleProteomics2025
Establishment of a Protocol for CE-MS Based Peptidome Analysis of Human Saliva.
Article in Proteomics, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Recent Developments and Applications of Capillary and Microchip Electrophoresis in Proteomics and Peptidomics (2023-2025).Journal of separation science · 2026Review
- Recent Developments in Capillary and Microchip Electroseparations of Peptides (2023-mid 2025).Electrophoresis · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Proteins and peptides indicate physiological or pathological states and are investigated to identify markers to scrutinize health and disease surveillance. Saliva contains many proteins and peptides that could serve as biomarkers, offering a potential noninvasive approach for disease detection. To enable the assessment of the saliva proteome and peptidome as sources of biomarkers, protocols for sampling, sample preparation, and measurements have to be developed. We present the results of peptidome analysis from saliva samples collected at different time points before and after breakfast from 14 healthy adults (50% male, mean age 42.7 ± 10.3 years). While similar methods have been previously applied to urine, our aim was to adapt and demonstrate the effectiveness of these protocols for saliva. Specifically, we aimed to establish a salivary peptide dataspace, including peptide amino acid sequences, and to evaluate the impact of food intake and time of sampling. Capillary electrophoresis-mass spectrometry (CE-MS) and CE-MS/MS were used for peptidome analysis. Per sample, 3147 ± 559 peptides were detectable, without significant differences in the number of detected peptides between sample collection times. However, some peptides differed significantly in their abundance between samples collected before breakfast and 1, 2 and 4 h after breakfast. Samples collected after breakfast were more consistent in their peptide content. Sequencing identified 630 peptides, fragments of 82 proteins, with the majority derived from proline-rich proteins. The data indicate that saliva for peptidomics is best collected 1 to 4 h after breakfast.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.