ReviewBiomedical reports2025
Diagnostic tools in respiratory medicine (Review).
Review in Biomedical reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Extracellular-Vesicle-Associated Nucleic Acids in the Diagnosis and Treatment of Respiratory Diseases: A Narrative Review.Pharmaceutics · 2026Review
- Artificial intelligence in respiratory medicine: From diagnosis to treatment and future directions.Chinese medical journal pulmonary and critical care medicine · 2026Review
- Epidemiology, Risk Factors, and Routine Blood Biomarkers of Aspergillosis in Cancer Patients in Jiangxi, China.Infection and drug resistance · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Recent advancements in diagnostic technologies have significantly transformed the landscape of respiratory medicine, aiming for early detection, improved specificity and personalized therapeutic strategies. Innovations in imaging such as multi-slice computed tomography (CT) scanners, high-resolution CT and magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) have revolutionized our ability to visualize and assess the structural and functional aspects of the respiratory system. These techniques are complemented by breakthroughs in molecular biology that have identified specific biomarkers and genetic determinants of respiratory diseases, enabling targeted diagnostic approaches. Additionally, functional tests including spirometry and exercise testing continue to provide valuable insights into pulmonary function and capacity. The integration of artificial intelligence is poised to further refine these diagnostic tools, enhancing their accuracy and efficiency. The present narrative review explores these developments and their impact on the management and outcomes of respiratory conditions, underscoring the ongoing shift towards more precise and less invasive diagnostic modalities in respiratory medicine.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.