ArticleFrontiers in oncology2025
Machine learning-based ultrasound radiomics for predicting risk of recurrence in breast cancer.
Article in Frontiers in oncology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed.
- Evaluating the Performance of Mammogram-Based AI Risk Model in Predicting Subsequent Breast Cancer in Women with a Prior History of Breast Cancer.Journal of clinical medicine · 2026Article
- A Parsimonious Ultrasound Radiomics and Ki-67 Model for Estimating MammaPrint Risk Categorization in HR+/HER2- Early Breast Cancer.Current oncology (Toronto, Ont.) · 2026Article
- SCAR-Net-assisted ultrasound diagnosis of postoperative scars and recurrent lesions in breast cancer.iScience · 2026Article
- Multimodal radiomics incorporating intratumoral heterogeneity for prognostic assessment of metastatic outcomes in invasive breast cancer.Breast cancer research : BCR · 2026Article
- Radiomics and Deep Learning: Bridging Breast Cancer Imaging Phenotypes and Genomic Heterogeneity.Breast cancer (Dove Medical Press) · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Purpose: To develop a radiomics model based on ultrasound images for predicting risk of recurrence in breast cancer patients. Methods: In this retrospective study, 420 patients with pathologically confirmed breast cancer were included, randomly divided into training (70%) and test (30%) sets, with an independent external validation cohort of 90 patients. According to St. Gallen recurrence risk criteria, patients were categorized into two groups, low-medium-risk and high-risk. Radiomics features were extracted from a radiomics analysis set using Pyradiomics. The informative radiomics features were screened using the minimum redundancy maximum relevance (mRMR) and the least absolute shrinkage and selection operator (LASSO) algorithms. Subsequently, radiomics models were constructed with eight machine learning algorithms. Three distinct nomogram models were created using the features selected through multivariate logistic regression, including the Clinic-Ultrasound (Clin-US), Clinic-Radiomics (Clin-Rad), and Clinic-Ultrasound-Radiomics (Clin-US-Rad) models. The receiver operating characteristic (ROC), calibration, and decision curve analysis (DCA) curves were used to evaluate the model's clinical applicability and predictive performance. Results: A total of 12 ultrasound radiomics features were screened, of which wavelet.LHL first order Mean features weighed more and tended to have a high risk of recurrence. The higher the risk of recurrence, the higher the radiomics score (Rad-score) in all three sets (training, test, and external validation set, all Conclusion: The machine learning-based ultrasound radiomics model were useful for predicting the risk of recurrence in breast cancer. The nomograms show promising potential in assessing the recurrence risk of breast cancer. This non-invasive approach offers crucial guidance for the diagnosis and treatment of the condition.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.