ArticleFrontiers in endocrinology2025
The metabolic syndrome-insulin resistance index: a tool for identifying dyslipidemia across varied glucose metabolic score in patients with cardiovascular disease.
Article in Frontiers in endocrinology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Comparison of the predictive power of novel insulin resistance, lipid metabolism and obesity indices for the risk of developing dyslipidaemia in adults.BMC endocrine disorders · 2026Article
- CYP2C19 intermediate and poor metabolizer statuses may be associated with coronary atherosclerosis among patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus.Frontiers in medicine · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
11 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Purpose: The METS-IR index, a non-insulin-based metabolic score, represents a new marker closely linked to insulin resistance. This study aimed to evaluate the relationship between the METS-IR index and dyslipidemia in individuals diagnosed with Cardiovascular disease (CVD), as well as to delve deeper into how varying glucose metabolic conditions influence this relationship. Methods: This multicenter retrospective investigation encompassed 214,717 individuals diagnosed with CVD across China, spanning from September 1, 2014, to June 1, 2022, ultimately incorporating 17,632 cases in the conclusive analysis. All cases were grouped according to quartiles of METS-IR. The American College of Cardiology classifies dyslipidemia into four distinct categories: hyper-triglyceridemia (hyper-TG), hyper-cholesterolemia (hyper-TC), hypo-high-density lipoprotein cholesterolemia (hypo-HDL), and hyper-low-density lipoprotein cholesterolemia (hyper-LDL). Dyslipidemia is diagnosed when any one of these conditions is present. Logistic regression analysis was performed to estimate the odds ratio (OR) and 95% confidence interval (CI), assessing the relationship between the METS-IR index and dyslipidemia risk in patients with CVD. To evaluate the precision of the METS-IR index in identifying dyslipidemia, receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve was produced. Results: The results of the baseline analysis showed that 11,934 cases had dyslipidemia, with notable variations observed in the clinical and biological attributes among CVD cases ( Conclusion: The risk of developing dyslipidemia is positively associated with heightened METS-IR levels in individuals afflicted with CVD, and these relationships hold significance across all glycemic metabolic conditions. METS-IR could potentially aid in forecasting the risk of dyslipidemia development in individuals diagnosed with CVD.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.