ArticleFrontiers in genetics2025
Regional patterns of genetic variants in expanded carrier screening: a next-generation sequencing pilot study in Fujian Province, China.
Article in Frontiers in genetics, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed.
- Expanded carrier screening in China: a focused narrative review and conceptual implementation framework.European journal of human genetics : EJHG · 2026Review
- Genetic spectrum analysis of high-carrier-frequency monogenic disorders based on whole-exome sequencing in the Chinese general population.Human genomics · 2026Article
- Clinical Outcomes of Fetal Ventriculomegaly: A Retrospective Analysis from a Tertiary Referral Center.International journal of women's health · 2026Article
- Pilot Study of Preconception Carrier Screening in Russia: Initial Findings and Challenges.Genes · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
13 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: This pilot study aimed to characterize the regional distribution of genetic variants associated with autosomal recessive and X-linked recessive (AR/XLR) conditions in Fujian Province, Southeast China, to inform the development of targeted carrier screening programs. Methods: An expanded carrier screening (ECS) panel utilizing next-generation sequencing (NGS) technology was designed to analyze 332 genes associated with 343 AR/XLR conditions. The panel was applied to 440 samples obtained from individuals in Fujian Province. Single nucleotide variants and copy number variations (CNVs) were identified and analyzed using a multidimensional approach that incorporated demographic characteristics, carrier frequencies, and the genetic burden of AR/XLR diseases. Results: A total of 511 variants were detected among the 440 participants, including 43 CNVs (8.41%), affecting 133 genes associated with 123 conditions. The mean number of pathogenic or likely pathogenic variants per sample was 1.16. The highest genetic burden was observed in couples seeking medically assisted reproduction (MAR group), who had histories of fetal loss, second- or third-trimester abnormalities, or postnatal abnormalities. In clinical settings, the percentage of at-risk couples (ARCs) was 6.36% (n = 14), involving seven conditions, with no statistically significant difference in ARC incidence between couples undergoing genetic screening (GS group) and the MAR group. The cumulative carrier rate for 28 genes was ≥1/100. Recurrent variants in Conclusion: NGS-based ECS demonstrates significant potential for assessing the genetic burden of AR/XLR conditions and identifying ARCs in Fujian Province. However, before integrating ECS into regional public health initiatives, the development of a region-specific, curated disease panel is necessary to optimize screening efficacy and clinical utility.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.