ArticleJournal of cell science2025
Resolution in super-resolution microscopy - facts, artifacts, technological advancements and biological applications.
Article in Journal of cell science, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
9 citing papers in PubMed.
- SIMworks-an integrated software suite for quality-controlled augmented quantitative structured illumination microscopy.Nature protocols · 2026Review
- AS1411 aptamer-functionalized, cell membrane-camouflaged nanoparticles for targeted tumor cells imaging in the Raman silent region.Analytical and bioanalytical chemistry · 2026Article
- Cholesterol in Myelin: Supply Routes, Pathological Consequences, Biophysical Governance, and Future Frontiers.Neuroscience bulletin · 2026Article
- Imaging-Guided Omics Technologies for Resolving Rare Cancer States and Advancing Nanomedicine.Nano letters · 2026Review
- 4Pi stimulated Raman scattering for label-free super-resolution chemical imaging.Science advances · 2026Article
- Efficient cellular transformation via protein delivery through the protrusion-derived extracellular vesicles.Nature communications · 2025Article
- Nanobiosensors for Single-Molecule Diagnostics: Toward Integration with Super-Resolution Imaging.Biosensors · 2025Review
- 4-Pi Stimulated Raman Scattering for Label-free Super-resolution Chemical Imaging.bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2025Article
- Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Super-resolution microscopy (SRM) has undeniable potential for scientific discovery, yet still presents many challenges that hinder its widespread adoption, including technical trade-offs between resolution, speed and photodamage, as well as limitations in imaging live samples and larger, more complex biological structures. Furthermore, SRM often requires specialized expertise and complex instrumentation, which can deter biologists from fully embracing the technology. In this Perspective, a follow-up to our recent Q&A article, we aim to demystify these challenges by addressing common questions and misconceptions surrounding SRM. Experts offer practical insights into how biologists can maximize the benefits of SRM while navigating issues such as photobleaching, image artifacts and the limitations of existing techniques. We also highlight recent developments in SRM that continue to push the boundaries of resolution. Our goal is to equip researchers with the crucial knowledge they need to harness the full potential of SRM.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.