Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40421965›Full record

SynthesisHealth technology assessment (Winchester, England)2025

Behaviour change interventions to promote physical activity in people with intermittent claudication: the OPTIMA systematic review.

Ukachukwu O Abaraogu, Philippa Dall, Chris Seenan, Sarah Rhodes, Trish Gorely, Joanna McParland, Julie Brittenden, Ebuka M Anieto, Lorna Booth, Cathy Gormal and 6 more

Abstract readSystematic Review
In one paragraph

Synthesis in Health technology assessment (Winchester, England), 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

16 authors.

Ukachukwu O AbaraoguDivision of Biological Sciences and Health, School of Health and Life Sciences, University of the West of Scotland, Paisley, UK.ORCID 0000-0002-1967-1459
Philippa DallResearch Centre for Health (ReaCH), School of Health and Life Sciences, Glasgow Caledonian University, Glasgow, UK.ORCID 0000-0002-1958-1517
Chris SeenanResearch Centre for Health (ReaCH), School of Health and Life Sciences, Glasgow Caledonian University, Glasgow, UK.ORCID 0000-0003-4379-7913
Sarah RhodesDivision of Population Health, Health Services Research & Primary Care University of Manchester, Manchester, UK.ORCID 0000-0002-5837-801X
Trish GorelyCentre for Rural Health Sciences, University of the Highlands and Islands, Inverness, UK.ORCID 0000-0001-7367-0679
Joanna McParlandResearch Centre for Health (ReaCH), School of Health and Life Sciences, Glasgow Caledonian University, Glasgow, UK.ORCID 0000-0003-0580-2179
Julie BrittendenInstitute of Cardiovascular Research, University of Glasgow, Glasgow, UK.ORCID 0000-0002-1441-6774
Ebuka M AnietoResearch Centre for Health (ReaCH), School of Health and Life Sciences, Glasgow Caledonian University, Glasgow, UK.ORCID 0000-0002-8160-9701
Lorna BoothResearch Centre for Health (ReaCH), School of Health and Life Sciences, Glasgow Caledonian University, Glasgow, UK.ORCID 0000-0001-5776-3541
Cathy GormalPatient and Public Involvement Representative.
Jeremy DearlingPatient and Public Involvement Representative.ORCID 0000-0002-1007-1895
Candida FentonNessie Evidence Synthesis, University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, UK.ORCID 0000-0003-2516-9956
Sarah AudsleySport, Exercise and Rehabilitation, Northumbria University, Newcastle, UK.ORCID 0000-0002-0372-6881
Kimberley FairerAllied Health Professions Research and Innovation Unit, Oxford University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Oxford, UK.ORCID 0000-0002-7432-5823
Lindsay BearnePopulation Health Research Institute, St George's School of Health and Medical Sciences, City St George's, University of London, London, UK.ORCID 0000-0002-2190-8590
Dawn A SkeltonResearch Centre for Health (ReaCH), School of Health and Life Sciences, Glasgow Caledonian University, Glasgow, UK.ORCID 0000-0001-6223-9840

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: People with intermittent claudication are significantly less active compared to their peers without intermittent claudication, worsening future health outcomes. Supervised exercise therapy is not commonly available, but behaviour change techniques in unsupervised interventions can improve physical activity. Specific behaviour change techniques, theoretical mechanisms and contextual features linked to effectiveness remain unclear. Objectives: To conduct an integrative synthesis of: effectiveness of behaviour change technique-based interventions on daily physical activity and clinical-/patient-reported outcomes; behaviour change techniques and theoretical mechanisms within effective behaviour change technique-based interventions; feasibility and acceptability. Primary outcomes: short term (< 6 months) and maintenance (> 6 months) of daily physical activity. Secondary outcomes: clinical-/patient-reported outcomes. Data sources: Seven primary studies databases; Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews, the Database of Abstracts of Reviews of Effects, Health Technology Assessment Database and Trial Registers to 31 August 2023. Review methods: Systematic review 1: interventions incorporating ≥ 1 behaviour change technique (coded using Behaviour Change Technique Taxonomy version 1, and Theoretical Domains Framework). Systematic review 2: quantitative, qualitative, mixed-methods research on patient/provider experiences. Study quality assessed using revised Cochrane risk-of-bias tool for randomised trials; Risk Of Bias In Non-randomised Studies - of Interventions and Mixed Methods Appraisal Tool. Results: Fifty-three articles (41 studies) were included in systematic review 1, and 28 articles (28 studies) in systematic review 2. Eleven randomised controlled trials demonstrated that behaviour change technique-based interventions increased daily physical activity in the short term [increase of 0.20 standardised mean difference (95% confidence interval 0.07 to 0.33), ~ 473 steps/day] with high certainty. Evidence of maintenance of daily physical activity is unclear (increase of 0.12 standardised mean difference; ~ 288 steps/day). Behaviour change techniques aimed at improving patients' intentions to engage in physical activity were most effective. Network analysis suggests that behaviour change technique-based interventions improved daily physical activity and may be better than supervised exercise therapy in maintaining daily physical activity. behaviour change technique-based interventions were acceptable and had short-medium-term benefits to initial/absolute claudication distance/time, walking impairment scores and disease-specific quality of life. Conclusions: The behaviour change technique-based interventions are effective, targeting intention to engage in physical activity, in improving daily physical activity and functional outcomes in the short term, although evidence is limited for maintenance. There is a need for more randomised controlled trials examining daily physical activity and clinical outcomes, including longer-term follow-up, with detailed descriptions of behaviour change techniques, costs and provider views. Study registration: This study is registered as PROSPERO CRD42020159869. Funding: This award was funded by the National Institute for Health and Care Research (NIHR) Health Technology Assessment programme (NIHR award ref: NIHR130664) and is published in full in

Indexed as

Behavior TherapyExerciseIntermittent ClaudicationExercise TherapyHumansPatient Reported Outcome MeasuresQuality of LifeTechnology Assessment, BiomedicalBEHAVIOUR CHANGEEXERCISEHEALTH BEHAVIOURINTERMITTENT CLAUDICATIONMAINTENANCEMETA-ANALYSISPERIPHERAL ARTERIAL DISEASEPHYSICAL ACTIVITYSYSTEMATIC REVIEW

Identifiers

PMID40421965
PMCPMC12127896

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.