ArticleBiomimetics (Basel, Switzerland)2025
Design, Modeling, and Experimental Validation of a Bio-Inspired Rigid-Flexible Continuum Robot Driven by Flexible Shaft Tension-Torsion Synergy.
Article in Biomimetics (Basel, Switzerland), 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- A Bioinspired Soft Manipulator Based on Wave Spring Structure: Design and Control.Biomimetics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
- From Biological Analogs to Robotic Embodiment: A Systematic Biomimetic Translation Framework Mediated by Traditional Craft.Biomimetics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
Abstract
This paper presents a bio-inspired rigid-flexible continuum robot driven by flexible shaft tension-torsion synergy, tackling the trade-off between actuation complexity and flexibility in continuum robots. Inspired by the muscular arrangement of octopus arms, enabling versatile multi-degree-of-freedom (DoF) movements, the robot achieves 6-DoF motion and 1-DoF gripper opening and closing movement with only six flexible shafts, simplifying actuation while boosting dexterity. A comprehensive kinetostatic model, grounded in Cosserat rod theory, is developed; this model explicitly incorporates the coupling between the spinal rods and flexible shafts, the distributed gravitational effects of spacer disks, and friction within the guide tubes. Experimental validation using a physical prototype reveals that accounting for spacer disk gravity diminishes the maximum shape prediction error from 20.56% to 0.60% relative to the robot's total length. Furthermore, shape perception experiments under no-load and 200 g load conditions show average errors of less than 2.01% and 2.61%, respectively. Performance assessments of the distal rigid joint showcased significant dexterity, including a 53° grasping range, 360° continuous rotation, and a pitching range from -40° to +45°. Successful obstacle avoidance and long-distance target reaching experiments further demonstrate the robot's effectiveness, highlighting its potential for applications in medical and industrial fields.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.